Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was corrected to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was corrected to" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It is used to indicate that something has been changed from its original form, usually into something better. For example: "The incorrect spelling of the word 'definately' was corrected to 'definitely'."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Correction: This article was corrected to make it clear that the mayor of Gothenburg is a woman.

News & Media

The Guardian

Correction: This article was corrected to clarify the nature of the Zapruder film.

News & Media

Huffington Post

It was corrected to say gigawatt-hour.

The second date was corrected to 1993.

News & Media

The Guardian

The final sentence was corrected to read 'sacred' cows.

Maternal Mortality Rates was corrected to Maternal Mortality Ratio.

News & Media

The Guardian

This was corrected to "algorithm" on August 6th.

News & Media

The Economist

Another later issue was corrected to "was five times married to four whores;".

Twitter: @chakrabortty This article was corrected to make £539,000 debt per taxpayer £539.

The graphic on this story was corrected to add a missing black pawn on h5.

The word "principal" was corrected to "principle" in Martin London's letter.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was corrected to" when you want to emphasize that an error or inaccuracy has been identified and fixed. This highlights the improvement in precision or accuracy.

Common error

Avoid using "was corrected to" for trivial edits like stylistic preferences or rephrasing for clarity. Reserve it for instances where factual inaccuracies or demonstrable errors were present.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was corrected to" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that a previous error or inaccuracy has been rectified. It emphasizes the action of correcting something, as seen in Ludwig's examples from news, science, and academic contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was corrected to" is a very common and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that something inaccurate has been rectified. As Ludwig AI confirms, it finds extensive use across various domains, particularly in news, science, and academic writing, where accuracy is crucial. The phrase serves the purpose of informing readers about changes made to ensure correctness and maintain credibility. When using this phrase, it's essential to reserve it for instances involving factual inaccuracies, avoiding its overuse for minor edits. Remember to consider alternatives like "was adjusted to" or "was revised to" depending on the context.

FAQs

How can I use "was corrected to" in a sentence?

Use "was corrected to" to indicate that something inaccurate has been changed to something accurate, such as "The initial report stating the company's losses was corrected to reflect the actual figures".

What are some alternatives to "was corrected to"?

You can use alternatives like "was adjusted to", "was revised to", or "was amended to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was corrected to" or "has been corrected to"?

Both "was corrected to" and "has been corrected to" are grammatically correct, but "was corrected to" is used when referring to a past correction, whereas "has been corrected to" implies the correction has been made recently and the change is still relevant.

What's the difference between "was corrected to" and "was updated to"?

"Was corrected to" implies the removal of an error and the insertion of accurate information. "Was updated to", on the other hand, suggests adding newer or more current information, not necessarily fixing an error.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: