was adjusted to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was adjusted to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a change made to something in order to fit a particular condition or requirement. Example: "The settings of the machine were adjusted to optimize performance for the new production line."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Initial pH was adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.1.

AMB Express

The medium was adjusted to pH 7.

AMB Express

Initial OD660 was adjusted to 1.0.

AMB Express

The initial pH was adjusted to 7.5.

AMB Express

Now the pH was adjusted to 12.5.

International Nano Letters

pH was adjusted to 3.3 using NaOH.

AMB Express

The initial OD600 was adjusted to 0.1.

AMB Express

The pH was adjusted to be 7.

Chemistry Central Journal

The pH was adjusted to 6.8.

AMB Express

pH value was adjusted to 6.5.

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Ventilation was adjusted to achieve normocapnia.

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing experimental procedures, use "was adjusted to" to clearly indicate changes made to parameters such as pH, temperature, or concentration to achieve specific conditions.

Common error

Avoid shifting between past and present tense when describing adjustments. Ensure that if you start with "was adjusted to", you maintain past tense throughout the description.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was adjusted to" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject received an action, specifically modification or alteration. It typically introduces a description of how something was changed to meet a certain condition or standard. As Ludwig AI suggests, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Unknown

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was adjusted to" is a common and grammatically correct construction used to describe the modification of something to meet a specific condition or requirement. Predominantly found in scientific and technical writing, it indicates that a parameter or setting has been altered for a particular purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. While alternatives like "was modified to" and "was adapted to" exist, "was adjusted to" effectively conveys the sense of fine-tuning or alteration. Remember to maintain consistent tense and avoid using it for inherent, unchangeable qualities.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was modified to

Focuses on the act of changing something, often implying a more significant alteration than a simple adjustment.

was adapted to

Emphasizes the process of making something suitable for a new use or condition.

was altered to

Highlights a change in the form or nature of something, suggesting a more substantial transformation.

was calibrated for

Specifically implies setting an instrument or device for accurate measurement or function.

was fine-tuned for

Suggests making small, precise adjustments to optimize performance.

was set to

Implies a configuration or setting has been established, often for a specific purpose.

was regulated to

Focuses on controlling or maintaining something at a desired level or standard.

was amended to

Suggests a formal or legal change made to a document or agreement.

was corrected to

Implies that something was wrong and it has been changed to what is right.

was revised to

Indicates a more thorough review and alteration, often to improve accuracy or clarity.

FAQs

How can I use "was adjusted to" in a sentence?

Use "was adjusted to" to indicate that a parameter, setting, or element was modified to meet a specific requirement or achieve a desired outcome. For example, "The temperature "was adjusted to" 37°C to promote optimal cell growth."

What are some alternatives to "was adjusted to"?

Alternatives include "was modified to", "was adapted to", "was set to", and "was calibrated for", each carrying slightly different nuances depending on the context.

Is it better to say "was adjusted to" or "adjusted to"?

Using "was adjusted to" is generally more appropriate when describing a completed action or a state that resulted from an adjustment. "Adjusted to" might be used in contexts describing adaptation or becoming accustomed to something, but is less suitable for describing the modification of a specific parameter.

When is it incorrect to use "was adjusted to"?

Avoid using "was adjusted to" when describing inherent qualities or characteristics that are not subject to modification. For instance, it would be incorrect to say "The natural color of the sample "was adjusted to" blue" if the color is an intrinsic property.