was consisted of

USAGE SUMMARY

'was consisted of' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a number of things that make up a whole, as in this example: The committee was consisted of five members from different backgrounds and experiences.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The RSM, the first approach, was consisted of Plackett Burman Design (PBD) and Central Composite Design (CCD).

Bioresource Technology

The only sickness there was consisted of sore arms, Dr. W. said.

The New Yorker

Until 1952, finance theory, such as it was, consisted of a set of wise observations and rules of thumb, without any overarching framework.

The New York Times - Books

The procedure followed was consisted of three phases.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

The applied electrolyte was consisted of 1M NaOH.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The control group was consisted of nasal breathing (NB) individuals.

Progress in Orthodontics

The ZnO core was consisted of the (002) plane of wurtzite structure; the ZnTe shell was consisted of the (111) plane of zincblende structure.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Briefly, the experimental setup was consisted of two coplanar glass slides (Fig. 3 (A)).

Progress in Biomaterials

It can be clearly seen that the sample was consisted of monodisperse snowflake-like microstructures.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The cork was consisted of several rows of densely-arranged flat cells.

Chemistry Central Journal

Mobile phase was consisted of 10% acetonitrile in ammonium bicarbonate buffer (10 mM, pH 8.11).

Nanoscale Research Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the composition of something, use "consisted of", "was composed of", or "was comprised of" for grammatical accuracy. Avoid "was consisted of".

Common error

The passive construction "was consisted of" is incorrect. Instead, use the active voice "consisted of" or rephrase using "was composed of" or "was comprised of" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was consisted of" functions as a verb phrase attempting to describe the composition of something. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig confirms the correct usage should be either the active form "consisted of" or passive constructions like "was composed of".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was consisted of" is a grammatically incorrect construction. While frequently used, particularly in scientific and technical writing, it should be avoided. As Ludwig AI explains, the correct forms are the active voice "consisted of" or the passive voice constructions such as "was composed of" or "was comprised of". Using the correct phrasing will improve clarity and credibility, especially in formal contexts. Despite its common appearance across various sources, including ScienceDirect and BMC, adhering to proper grammar is crucial for effective communication. Therefore, writers should prefer grammatically sound alternatives to ensure accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was composed of

Replaces "consisted of" with "composed of", offering a grammatically sound alternative to express the components of something.

was comprised of

Substitutes "consisted of" with "comprised of", providing a more standard and accepted way to indicate what something is made up of.

consisted of

Corrects "was consisted of" by removing the auxiliary verb "was", resulting in a grammatically correct phrase.

was made up of

An idiomatic alternative that clearly indicates the components of something.

included

Offers a simpler alternative, focusing on the inclusion of elements rather than the overall composition.

contained

Similar to "included", this focuses on the elements that were present within something.

was formed from

Focuses on the process of formation, highlighting the materials used.

was structured with

Emphasizes the arrangement and organization of components.

incorporated

Highlights that certain elements were integrated into a larger whole.

featured

Suggests that certain elements were prominent or noticeable parts of something.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "consist of" in a sentence?

Use "consist of" to describe what something is made of. For example, "The team consisted of five members". Avoid using "was consisted of", as it's grammatically incorrect.

What are some alternatives to "was consisted of"?

Instead of "was consisted of", use "was composed of", "was comprised of", or simply "consisted of" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Is "was consisted of" grammatically correct?

No, "was consisted of" is not grammatically correct. The correct form is "consisted of" or alternative phrases like "was made up of".

What is the difference between "consisted of" and "was composed of"?

"Consisted of" and "was composed of" are both used to describe the parts of a whole. However, "consisted of" is in the active voice, while "was composed of" is in the passive voice. Both are grammatically correct, but "was consisted of" is not.