was considerably small

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was considerably small" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when comparing two things or describing the size of something. For example: "The first apartment was considerably smaller than the second one."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

To isolate more reliable networks, we performed an analysis that was limited to the known phosphosites, although the number was considerably small.

BMC Genomics

The ratio between higher to lower numbers of significant probes in permuted datasets compared with the chronologically ordered dataset was considerably small in brain, VL muscles and kidney cortex (Table  1).

BMC Genomics

The number of proteins with known phosphomotifs was considerably small, and it was difficult to assign correct biological functions using a network that only connected them; therefore, we produced an interaction network related to proteins, including phosphomotifs, using known interaction information from BioGRID and STRING.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

This snake was considerably smaller than the others and blackish.

The New Yorker

The art world in the 19th century was considerably smaller than it is now.

The New York Times - Arts

The crowd for tonight's fight was considerably smaller than the predicted sellout of 51,000.

The New York Times - Sports

The total was considerably smaller than the number of killings he had claimed.

The New York Times

The new place was considerably smaller than the apartment in the Apthorp.

The New Yorker

And the one that pushed New York City to the brink was considerably smaller than today's.

The New York Times

But that study was considerably smaller and looked at only about 500 people.

The New York Times

Still, Mr. Bongo's majority was considerably smaller than those declared by his father, several times over 50percentt.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was considerably small", ensure that the context clearly establishes what is being compared. This helps the reader understand the degree of difference in size or quantity.

Common error

Avoid using "was considerably small" when the difference is only marginal. "Considerably" implies a noticeable and significant difference. If the size disparity is slight, opt for alternatives like "slightly smaller" or "somewhat smaller".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was considerably small" functions as a descriptive phrase indicating that something had a size or quantity that was notably less than expected or in comparison to something else. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is valid and provides context for expressing size differences.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was considerably small" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe something that is significantly less in size or amount. While it is not as common as other similar expressions, it is readily understandable. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, and it appears in various contexts, particularly in scientific and news media. When using this phrase, ensure that the context provides a clear comparison to emphasize the degree of smallness. Remember that "considerably" indicates a notable difference, so it should be used when the size disparity is substantial. Alternatives such as "was significantly smaller" or "was markedly less" can be used to provide a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was significantly smaller

Replaces "considerably" with "significantly", emphasizing a greater degree of difference in size.

was substantially reduced

Focuses on the act of reducing something in size, rather than just its state of being small.

was markedly less

Uses "markedly" to highlight that the small size is easily noticeable.

was noticeably diminutive

Replaces both "considerably" and "small" with synonyms, creating a more formal tone.

was appreciably smaller

Emphasizes that the difference in size is enough to be important or relevant.

was notably petite

Uses "petite" to describe something small, usually in a positive or endearing way.

was substantially tinier

Replace words such as 'considerably' and 'small' with similar synonyms.

was plainly undersized

Focuses on the deficiency in size, implying that it does not meet a certain standard.

was far from substantial

Emphasizes the lack of substantial size and it implies the opposite meaning of the search query.

was dwarfed by

Highlights the contrast in size by indicating that something else made it look smaller than normal.

FAQs

How can I use "was considerably small" in a sentence?

Use "was considerably small" to describe something that is noticeably smaller than another thing or what is expected. For example: "The initial budget "was considerably small" compared to the final expenses".

What are some alternatives to "was considerably small"?

You can use alternatives like "was significantly smaller", "was substantially reduced", or "was markedly less" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was considerably small", or should I use "was considerably smaller"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "was considerably smaller" is more common and often clearer, as it explicitly indicates a comparison. "Was considerably small" can work if the context makes the comparison obvious.

What does "considerably" emphasize in the phrase "was considerably small"?

The word "considerably" emphasizes the degree or extent to which something is small. It implies that the smallness is significant and noticeable.