Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was completely removed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was completely removed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that something has been taken away or erased completely. For example: All the files that had been corrupted by the virus were completely removed from the hard drive.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The layer was completely removed by FIB processing after the fabrication of the electrodes was completed.

Trapped air was completely removed prior to analysis.

The tumor was completely removed, without further treatment.

He was completely removed from the company last month.

News & Media

The New York Times

The AT1 receptor-bound radioligand was completely removed under the same conditions.

Science

Peptides

The inner rod was completely removed and the resulting tube was carefully extracted.

Science & Research

Nature

The selectively adsorbed RB was completely removed by acetone rinsing without disrupting the graphene sheets.

Science

Carbon

After about 15 min, carbon was completely removed from the deposited composite layer.

Mn was completely removed and no accumulation was detected into the kaolinite.

These results indicate that GSH was completely removed from the Au surface without increasing the size.

Its performance was satisfactory when applied to stable slabs and the loose concrete was completely removed.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was completely removed" to clearly and unambiguously state that something has been entirely taken away or eliminated. This phrasing leaves no room for doubt about the extent of the removal.

Common error

Avoid using "was completely removed" in situations where a simpler term like "removed" or "deleted" would suffice. Overusing it can make your writing sound unnecessarily formal or verbose.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was completely removed" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence underwent the action of being removed. The adverb "completely" emphasizes the thoroughness and finality of the removal. Ludwig confirms the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

13%

Wiki

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Academia

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was completely removed" is a grammatically sound and common expression used to indicate the total elimination of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is appropriate for various contexts, especially in scientific, technical, and formal communications. While versatile, consider simplifying the phrasing in very informal contexts. The term sees the most usage within scientific literature but also holds relevance within news media. When writing, ensure this phrase brings clarity and emphasis to the complete removal of something, as opposed to a partial or incomplete action.

FAQs

How can I use "was completely removed" in a sentence?

You can use "was completely removed" to indicate that something has been entirely taken away. For example, "The corrupted file "was completely removed" from the system".

What are some alternatives to "was completely removed"?

Some alternatives include "was entirely eliminated", "was totally eradicated", or "was fully extracted". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is "was completely removed" formal or informal?

"Was completely removed" is generally neutral to formal. While suitable for professional and academic writing, it might be slightly verbose for very informal contexts where "removed" alone would work.

What's the difference between "was removed" and "was completely removed"?

"Was removed" simply indicates that something has been taken away. "Was completely removed" emphasizes the thoroughness of the removal, leaving no trace behind. The addition of "completely" strengthens the statement.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: