Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was collaboration with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was collaboration with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a past partnership or teamwork with someone or a group in a specific context. Example: "The project was collaboration with several leading experts in the field to ensure its success."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
8 human-written examples
Crucial to Israel's success was collaboration with France.
Encyclopedias
Was collaboration with this article an accident, a car crash no one spotted?
News & Media
One of the undeniably successful ventures was collaboration with former Guns n' Roses axe slinger Slash that produced several interesting models ranging from the couple-a-hundred-buck Epiphone to an aged-replica instrument that was an exact duplicate of the guitarist's own instrument (all the way down to the scuffs and cigarette burns) that ran about ten grand.
News & Media
So it was collaboration with the local community.
News & Media
"And a large part of it was collaboration with the community".
News & Media
The key to the success of this initiative was collaboration with industry to identify what would work best to bring about the necessary change in understanding and commitment to improve control.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
51 human-written examples
A lot of my first album (3) was collaborations with my brother Stephen.
News & Media
Whether it was collaborations with Cam'Ron, duets with Usher, or Jermaine Dupri, Mariah Carey established a market for both sides of her world.
News & Media
"There's collaboration with peers, and sharing".
News & Media
A natural extension could be collaboration with enterprises to identify the skills necessary for given roles.
News & Media
New OK Go video is collaboration with Morton Salt.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was collaboration with", ensure the sentence clearly specifies the parties involved and the purpose or outcome of the collaboration. This clarifies the context and impact of the teamwork.
Common error
Avoid using "was collaboration with" without specifying who the collaboration was with. Always clearly state the individuals, teams, or organizations involved to provide clarity and context to your writing.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was collaboration with" functions as a descriptive element within a sentence, indicating a past collaborative relationship or effort. As Ludwig AI suggests, this phrase correctly denotes a partnership or teamwork. The examples show its role in attributing a successful outcome or a specific project aspect to a cooperative endeavor.
Frequent in
News & Media
37%
Science
33%
Encyclopedias
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
4%
Wiki
4%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was collaboration with" is a grammatically sound and usable phrase indicating a past cooperative effort, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It is most frequently found in news, media and scientific contexts. While relatively uncommon, the phrase clearly conveys that a project or initiative involved teamwork and shared responsibility. To ensure clarity, it's best practice to specify who the collaboration was with. Alternatives like "involved working with" or "featured a partnership with" can also be used to express similar ideas with slight variations in emphasis.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
involved collaboration with
Replaces "was" with "involved", focusing on the act of collaboration rather than a state of being.
entailed working with
Shifts the focus to the actual work and partnership involved.
featured a partnership with
Emphasizes the partnership aspect of the collaboration.
required teamwork with
Highlights the necessity of teamwork.
necessitated joint effort with
Stresses the need for a combined and coordinated effort.
was a joint venture with
Presents the collaboration as a formal joint venture.
depended on cooperation with
Highlights the reliance on cooperative efforts.
resulted from alliance with
Suggests that the collaboration stemmed from an alliance.
arose through synergy with
Focuses on the synergistic aspect, where combined efforts create a greater outcome.
was executed in tandem with
Highlights the parallel or simultaneous execution of work.
FAQs
What does "was collaboration with" mean?
The phrase "was collaboration with" indicates that a past project, effort, or initiative involved working together with another person, group, or organization.
How can I use "was collaboration with" in a sentence?
You can use "was collaboration with" to describe how a project or activity involved a partnership. For example, "The success of the project "depended on cooperation with" the local community".
What are some alternatives to "was collaboration with"?
Alternatives include "involved working with", "featured a partnership with", or "was a joint venture with" depending on the specific context.
Is it more appropriate to say "was a collaboration with" or "was collaboration with"?
Both phrases can be grammatically correct, but "was a collaboration with" is more common in formal writing. "Was collaboration with" is acceptable but might sound slightly less formal or more concise.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested