was clearly distinguished

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was clearly distinguished" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was made distinct or set apart in a clear manner in the past. Example: "In the report, the differences between the two methods was clearly distinguished, allowing for a better understanding of their respective advantages."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Each HD sample was clearly distinguished from controls.

Nature

Each cheese was clearly distinguished by its own microbial community dynamics.

Systematic and Applied Microbiology

It recommended that violence in intimate relationships was clearly distinguished from bullying and cyber-bullying in policy documents.

The Guardian

Thus, the mode of the layer growth (Volmer Weber or Stranski Krastanov) was clearly distinguished in the monitored data.

Surface and Coatings Technology

The vinylidene group adjacent to the chain end was clearly distinguished from other internal vinylidene structures for the first time using 1,2-dichlorobenzene as solvent.

Polymer

The nucleus of the cell was clearly distinguished as pointed in the figure.

Cancer Nanotechnology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Methane can be clearly distinguished with T1/T2∼10.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

At K>5, Rhodes is clearly distinguished from Turkey.

Nature

The numerous sports which have arisen are clearly distinguished, and their cultural value is pointed out.

Nature

The structure of the dibromoolefin 5(Br2) can be clearly distinguished from its AFM image (Fig. 3a).

Nature

In all other related studies4,8,9, only two subspecies (fastigiata and hypogaea) were clearly distinguished.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was clearly distinguished" when you want to emphasize that a difference or separation was easily noticeable and unambiguous.

Common error

While "was clearly distinguished" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make your writing seem less direct. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where appropriate, such as "the study clearly distinguished".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was clearly distinguished" functions as a verbal phrase in the passive voice. It indicates that a subject has been differentiated or set apart in a clear and unambiguous manner. According to Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was clearly distinguished" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, commonly found in academic, scientific, and journalistic contexts. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase serves to emphasize a noticeable difference or separation between two or more entities. While its usage is correct, considering active voice alternatives can enhance writing directness. Related phrases such as "was distinctly identified" or "was easily discernible" offer nuanced alternatives. Remember to use it when you aim to highlight a clear and unambiguous distinction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was distinctly identified

Focuses on the act of recognizing something as different, with emphasis on the act of identification.

was plainly differentiated

Emphasizes the lack of ambiguity in the process of distinguishing something.

was sharply demarcated

Suggests a clear boundary or separation between the items being distinguished.

was easily discernible

Highlights the ease with which something could be recognized or perceived as distinct.

was unambiguously separated

Emphasizes the lack of any doubt or confusion in the separation of items.

was manifestly set apart

Stresses that something was obviously and evidently separated.

was markedly contrasted

Focuses on the differences between things, highlighting the contrast.

was evidently discerned

Highlights the obviousness with which something was recognized.

stood out distinctly

Indicates that something was prominently different from its surroundings.

was conspicuously singled out

Highlights that something was noticeably chosen or distinguished from others.

FAQs

How can I use "was clearly distinguished" in a sentence?

You can use "was clearly distinguished" to emphasize a noticeable difference. For example, "The experimental group "was clearly distinguished" from the control group by their improved performance."

What are some alternatives to "was clearly distinguished"?

Alternatives include "was distinctly identified", "was plainly differentiated", or "was easily discernible", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was clearly distinguished"?

While "was clearly distinguished" is in the passive voice and grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "the analysis clearly distinguished") can sometimes make your writing more direct and impactful.

What's the difference between "was clearly distinguished" and "was clearly defined"?

"Was clearly distinguished" implies a separation or differentiation between two or more things. "Was clearly defined", on the other hand, means that something's meaning or scope was made precise and unambiguous.