was characterised as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was characterised as" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing how something or someone is defined or depicted in a particular way, often in a formal or academic context. Example: "The novel was characterised as a groundbreaking work that challenged traditional narrative structures."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A doodle consisting of random scribbles was characterised as a map of the tube station.

The Guardian - Tech

When the VF story hit the racks, Alexis was characterised as showing up to court wearing six-inch heels.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Therefore Michael Checkland (1987-92) was importantly an accountant and not a programme maker, as Milne was characterised as a brilliant programme maker who had not understood money.

The Guardian

Above all, the national interest was characterised as clearing the structural deficit in this parliament, while being determined to achieve growth.

The Guardian - Opinion

He was characterised as someone who just said rude things about people but he had a hugely generous and inspiring side".

The Guardian

And Foreman was characterised as "The Mummy', a sideshow joke of a fighter, with no intelligence and little talent, save that for knocking men out.

The Guardian - Sport

DFP was characterised as a slow-binding substrate.

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

In addition to both FMLs, the aluminium employed in both laminates was characterised as reference material.

Composite Structures

The biosurfactant produced by the isolate was characterised as a glycolipid.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

The research area was characterised as class I to IV on the CLSL and divided into 4 zones: negligible, low, moderate, and medium zones (Fig. 8).

Geoenvironmental Disasters

In A. oryzae, the orthologue of CLR-2 called ManR was characterised as a regulator of genes encoding mannan-degrading enzymes (Ogawa et al. 2013).

AMB Express

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was characterised as", ensure that the characterization is accurate and supported by evidence. This phrase is often used in formal writing to present a specific interpretation or understanding of a subject.

Common error

Avoid using "was characterised as" without specifying who or what is doing the characterizing. Provide context to ensure clarity. Instead of saying something "was characterised as bad", specify "the study "was characterised as flawed due to methodological errors".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was characterised as" functions as a passive voice construction. It indicates how a subject (person, thing, or concept) has been described, defined, or presented. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

54%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Social Media

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was characterised as" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction to describe how something or someone has been defined or portrayed. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a valid and useful phrase in English writing. It is commonly found in scientific and news-related contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the characterization is accurate and well-supported. Alternatives include "was described as" or "was defined as".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was described as

Uses 'described' instead of 'characterised', offering a more common synonym.

was defined as

Focuses on providing a formal definition rather than a general description.

was labeled as

Implies assigning a specific label or category to something.

was portrayed as

Suggests a depiction or representation, often in a creative or subjective manner.

was regarded as

Indicates a general opinion or assessment of something.

was known as

Highlights a common or recognized name or identity.

was considered to be

Expresses a considered judgment or evaluation.

was identified as

Focuses on recognizing or classifying something specific.

was classified as

Emphasizes placing something into a particular category or group.

was viewed as

Implies a specific perspective or viewpoint.

FAQs

How can I use "was characterised as" in a sentence?

Use "was characterised as" to describe how something or someone is defined or depicted. For example, "The period "was characterised as an issue era, where companies began noticing specific societal problems arising from social, environmental and community issues".

What can I say instead of "was characterised as"?

You can use alternatives like "was described as", "was defined as", or "was labeled as" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was characterised as" or "is characterised as"?

"Was characterised as" indicates a past characterization, while "is characterised as" indicates a present characterization. The choice depends on whether the characterization is ongoing or occurred in the past.

What's the difference between "was characterised as" and "was portrayed as"?

"Was characterised as" typically refers to a formal or factual description, whereas "was portrayed as" suggests a specific depiction, often subjective or artistic.