Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was build
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was build" is not correct in English.
The correct form is "was built." You can use "was built" to describe something that was constructed in the past. Example: "The bridge was built in 1920 and has been a vital part of the city's infrastructure ever since."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
She was 41; Yeats was 43.
News & Media
He was 14; she was 21.
News & Media
Cynthia was 6 and Meg was 3 1/2.
News & Media
She was 13; he was 15.
News & Media
She was 47, Willie was 41.
News & Media
She was 20, and he was 21.
News & Media
I was 19 and he was 16.
News & Media
She was 24 and I was 12.
News & Media
Captain Booter was 22; Alex was 19.
News & Media
Price was 19-6, and Sabathia was 21-7.
News & Media
The year was 2009; she was 84.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the past participle form of the verb "build", which is "built", when forming the passive voice in the past tense. The correct phrase is "was built".
Common error
Avoid using the base form of the verb "build" after "was". The correct form is the past participle "built". Using "was build" is a common grammatical error.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was build" is intended to function as part of a passive construction in the past tense. However, it is grammatically incorrect. The auxiliary verb "was" requires the past participle form of the main verb, which should be "built", not "build". Ludwig AI confirms this error.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was build" is a grammatically incorrect construction. The correct form is "was built", utilizing the past participle of the verb "build". As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase "was build" should be avoided in all contexts. Use alternatives such as "was constructed", "was erected", or "was created" to accurately convey the intended meaning.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was constructed
Replaces the grammatically incorrect "build" with the correct past participle "constructed".
was erected
Offers a more formal synonym for "constructed", implying a deliberate and often large-scale building process.
was created
Broadens the meaning to include any form of creation, not just physical construction.
was made
A simpler and more general alternative, suitable for describing how something was brought into existence.
was assembled
Specifically refers to the process of putting together different parts to form a whole.
was fabricated
Implies a more technical or industrial manufacturing process.
was formed
Suggests the process of something taking shape or being brought into a particular configuration.
was developed
Focuses on the gradual evolution and refinement of something over time.
was established
Highlights the act of founding or setting something up, often referring to institutions or organizations.
was produced
Emphasizes the act of manufacturing or generating something, often on a larger scale.
FAQs
What is the correct form, "was build" or "was built"?
"Was build" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "was built", which uses the past participle of the verb "build".
How can I use "was built" in a sentence?
Use "was built" to describe something that was constructed or created in the past, for example: "The house was built in 1920."
What are some alternatives to "was built"?
Alternatives include "was constructed", "was erected", or "was created", depending on the specific context.
What is the difference between "was build" and "was being built"?
"Was build" is incorrect. "Was being built" describes an ongoing action in the past (past continuous passive), whereas "was built" describes a completed action in the past (simple past passive).
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested