Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was build

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was build" is not correct in English.
The correct form is "was built." You can use "was built" to describe something that was constructed in the past. Example: "The bridge was built in 1920 and has been a vital part of the city's infrastructure ever since."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

She was 41; Yeats was 43.

News & Media

Independent

He was 14; she was 21.

Cynthia was 6 and Meg was 3 1/2.

News & Media

The New Yorker

She was 13; he was 15.

News & Media

The New York Times

She was 47, Willie was 41.

News & Media

The New York Times

She was 20, and he was 21.

News & Media

The New York Times

I was 19 and he was 16.

She was 24 and I was 12.

Captain Booter was 22; Alex was 19.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Price was 19-6, and Sabathia was 21-7.

The year was 2009; she was 84.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the past participle form of the verb "build", which is "built", when forming the passive voice in the past tense. The correct phrase is "was built".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of the verb "build" after "was". The correct form is the past participle "built". Using "was build" is a common grammatical error.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was build" is intended to function as part of a passive construction in the past tense. However, it is grammatically incorrect. The auxiliary verb "was" requires the past participle form of the main verb, which should be "built", not "build". Ludwig AI confirms this error.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was build" is a grammatically incorrect construction. The correct form is "was built", utilizing the past participle of the verb "build". As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase "was build" should be avoided in all contexts. Use alternatives such as "was constructed", "was erected", or "was created" to accurately convey the intended meaning.

FAQs

What is the correct form, "was build" or "was built"?

"Was build" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "was built", which uses the past participle of the verb "build".

How can I use "was built" in a sentence?

Use "was built" to describe something that was constructed or created in the past, for example: "The house was built in 1920."

What are some alternatives to "was built"?

Alternatives include "was constructed", "was erected", or "was created", depending on the specific context.

What is the difference between "was build" and "was being built"?

"Was build" is incorrect. "Was being built" describes an ongoing action in the past (past continuous passive), whereas "was built" describes a completed action in the past (simple past passive).

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

60%

Authority and reliability

1.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: