was brought in

USAGE SUMMARY

"was brought in" is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase can be used when referring to someone or something being brought to a specific location or into a specific situation. For example, "The injured hiker was brought in by a volunteer search and rescue team."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

"She was brought in by the paramedics.

The New Yorker

First, it was brought in by Labour.

The Guardian

The English elm itself was brought in by the Romans.

Independent

Mr. Sheen was brought in as a different character.

The New York Times

Mr. Condon was brought in as a troubleshooter.

The New York Times

He was brought in to clean up the corruption.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

8 human-written examples

Then it was brought in-house.

The Guardian

Detainees were being brought in as well.

The New Yorker

Ramires is brought in instead.

The Guardian - Sport

Weapons are brought in by hand.

The Guardian

Outside developers will be brought in later.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was brought in" to clearly indicate a passive action where someone or something is introduced or included, emphasizing the recipient of the action rather than the actor. For instance, "New equipment "was brought in" to improve efficiency."

Common error

Avoid using "was brought in" when you want to emphasize who performed the action. In such cases, switch to an active voice: "The team brought in a consultant" is clearer and more direct than "A consultant "was brought in" by the team" if the team's action is the focus.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was brought in" functions as a passive voice construction, typically used to indicate that someone or something was introduced, recruited, or included in a specific context. This aligns with Ludwig AI's assessment of correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was brought in" is a grammatically correct and commonly used passive voice phrase, predominantly found in news and media contexts. According to Ludwig AI, it is suitable for indicating the introduction or inclusion of someone or something, focusing on the recipient of the action. While versatile, writers should consider using active voice for clarity when the actor is important. Alternatives like "was introduced" or "was recruited" can provide nuanced variations. When using this phrase in your writing, ensure you are using it to describe the inclusion or addition of something to a team, effort, or project.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was introduced

Focuses on the act of introducing someone or something new.

was selected

Highlights that a choice was made when bringing someone in.

was recruited

Highlights the process of actively seeking and hiring someone.

was appointed

Emphasizes the aspect of assigning someone to a role.

was hired

Emphasizes the employment aspect of bringing someone in.

was included

Indicates that something or someone was made part of a larger group or system.

was ushered in

Implies a formal or ceremonious introduction.

was enlisted

Suggests a formal or official process of being brought in.

was drafted

Implies a more forceful or obligatory inclusion.

was commenced

Focuses on the beginning or starting point of something being brought in.

FAQs

How do I use "was brought in" in a sentence?

Use "was brought in" to indicate that someone or something was introduced or included, focusing on the recipient of the action. For example, "The expert "was brought in" to solve the problem."

What can I say instead of "was brought in"?

Alternatives include "was introduced", "was recruited", or "was hired", depending on the context. Choose the phrase that best fits the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was brought in"?

While "was brought in" is grammatically correct, consider using active voice for clarity if the actor is important. For example, instead of "The solution "was brought in" by the team", say "The team brought in the solution".

What's the difference between "was brought in" and "was taken in"?

"Was brought in" implies introduction or inclusion, whereas "was taken in" suggests deception or being sheltered. For example, "The consultant "was brought in" to advise the company", versus "He "was taken in" by their false promises."