was authorized for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was authorized for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone or something has been given permission or approval for a specific action or purpose. Example: "The contractor was authorized for the project after meeting all the necessary requirements."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

In 1998, after the accord at Wye, Md., another $300 million was authorized for the Palestinians.

The New York Times

More than $2 billion was authorized for construction work to be done over the next three years.

The New York Times

While the NATO intervention was authorized for international law purposes by the Security Council, in domestic law Congress did not authorize Mr. Obama to participate.

The New York Times

"He didn't say anything until 1997, and it took me two years to rebuild his records and show that he was authorized for an award".

The New Yorker

The commission then issued a tweet stating that it alone was authorized for talks, and had not met with representatives of the "Kabul administration".

The New Yorker

Jack Miller, Norwalk's chief financial officer, said an estimated cost of $11.5 million was authorized for the garage in the city's capital budget last year.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

23 human-written examples

Unlike the Apple TV and other iOS devices, the Mac Mini must be authorized for FairPlay, reducing available authorizations for other computers.

Wikipedia

Authorization state determines whether the requirement is authorized for development.

EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems

Its municipal landfill, the Waimanalo Gulch Landfill, is authorized for use only through 2012.

The New York Times

Extensive privileges of home rule are authorized for the cities as well.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Then, if the benefits sufficiently outweigh the costs, money might be authorized for construction.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was authorized for", clearly state who granted the authorization and the specific purpose or action that was authorized. This adds clarity and context to your writing.

Common error

Avoid passive constructions where the authorizing entity is unclear. Instead of "The project was authorized for", specify "The committee was authorized for the project." to maintain accountability and transparency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was authorized for" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that something or someone received permission or approval. Ludwig shows it's used to express that an action or resource has been officially sanctioned for a specific purpose.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

32%

Wiki

16%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was authorized for" is a grammatically sound and professionally adequate passive voice phrase used to indicate official permission or approval for something. As demonstrated by Ludwig, it commonly appears in news, scientific, and encyclopedic contexts. The most appropriate substitutes include phrases such as "was approved for" and "was permitted for". While "was authorized for" is a useful expression, it's crucial to specify the authorizing entity to maintain clarity and accountability. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is suitable for formal writing and communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was permitted for

Changes the verb to 'permitted', implying allowed but possibly not officially sanctioned.

was approved for

Replaces 'authorized' with 'approved', suggesting a formal endorsement.

was sanctioned for

Substitutes 'authorized' with 'sanctioned', indicating official permission or endorsement, often by an authority.

was designated for

Replaces 'authorized' with 'designated', implying that something was assigned for a specific purpose.

was allocated for

Changes 'authorized' to 'allocated', suggesting that resources or funds were specifically assigned.

received authorization for

Restructures the sentence to focus on receiving authorization, rather than the state of being authorized.

obtained approval for

Similar to receiving authorization, this emphasizes the act of gaining approval.

was entitled to

Implies a right or qualification to something, differing slightly from direct authorization.

had the green light for

An idiomatic expression meaning permission to proceed; less formal than "was authorized for".

was cleared for

Suggests that any obstacles have been removed, and permission has been granted.

FAQs

How can I use "was authorized for" in a sentence?

Use "was authorized for" to indicate that something or someone received official permission or approval for a specific action or purpose. For example, "The funding "was authorized for" the new research project".

What's a more formal alternative to "was authorized for"?

A more formal alternative would be "was sanctioned for", which suggests an official endorsement by an authority.

Which is correct, "was authorized for" or "was authorize to"?

"Was authorized for" is correct when indicating permission for a specific purpose. "Was authorize to" is grammatically incorrect; the correct construction is "was authorized to". For example, "He "was authorized for" the task", and "He was authorized to complete the task".

Is "was authorized for" commonly used in formal writing?

Yes, "was authorized for" is frequently used in formal writing, especially in legal, official, and academic contexts to indicate permissions, approvals, or allocations. For example, funding "was allocated for" or work was sanctioned for.