Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was amplified

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was amplified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where something has been increased or made more intense, often in the context of sound, emotions, or effects. Example: "The speaker's voice was amplified to ensure everyone in the audience could hear the message clearly."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Moreover, it was amplified.

News & Media

The New York Times

anisopliae was amplified.

No gene was amplified in four isolates.

In the immensity of the land, everything was amplified.

News & Media

The Guardian

The sound was amplified to a killing roar.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Later, this trick was amplified on the evening pieces.

The resulting converted DNA was amplified by PCR and purified.

Science & Research

Nature

Eluted DNA was amplified with qPCR using primers listed below.

Science & Research

Nature

Each tcdC gene was amplified by PCR as previously described33.

Science & Research

Nature

But what a pity that Mr. Trakas was amplified.

Then HBB site was amplified and sequenced.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was amplified", consider the specific nuance you want to convey. If you want to emphasize an increase in intensity, "was intensified" might be more appropriate. If you want to highlight the addition of something that enhances the original, "was augmented" could be a better choice.

Common error

Avoid using "was amplified" too frequently in formal or academic writing. While grammatically correct, it can sometimes sound less sophisticated than alternatives like "was enhanced" or "was augmented", depending on the context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was amplified" serves as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something has been made larger, more intense, or more extended. Ludwig's examples demonstrate its use across various contexts, from sound to emotions, showing its capacity to describe an increase or enhancement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

39%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was amplified" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that indicates an increase in magnitude, intensity, or extent. According to Ludwig, it functions as a passive verb phrase and is employed across various contexts, including science and news media. While versatile, careful consideration should be given to context to determine whether alternatives such as "was enhanced" or "was intensified" might be more appropriate. Despite its correctness, overuse in highly formal writing should be avoided for stylistic reasons. Overall, its frequent occurrence and widespread application make it a valuable addition to one's writing repertoire.Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

FAQs

How can I use "was amplified" in a sentence?

You can use "was amplified" to indicate that something has been increased or intensified. For example, "The sound "was amplified" to ensure everyone could hear."

What are some alternatives to "was amplified"?

Alternatives include "was enhanced", "was intensified", or "was magnified", depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Is it better to say "was amplified" or "was increased"?

"Was increased" is a more general term. "Was amplified" suggests a more significant or noticeable increase, often related to sound or other sensory experiences. Use "was increased" when simply noting a rise in quantity or degree.

What's the difference between "was amplified" and "was augmented"?

"Was amplified" typically means something was made louder or more intense. "Was augmented" means something was supplemented or enhanced by adding something extra. For example, "The music "was amplified"," versus "The presentation "was augmented" with visual aids."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: