Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was allowed

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was allowed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that permission was granted in the past for someone to do something. Example: "He was allowed to leave early from work yesterday."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That was allowed.

Eventually, I was allowed inside.

News & Media

The New York Times

Only one voice was allowed.

News & Media

Independent

Carrie was allowed just one.

News & Media

The New Yorker

No mobile roaming was allowed.

News & Media

The Economist

Saddam was allowed to survive.

News & Media

The New Yorker

I was allowed in.

So I was allowed to stay.

News & Media

The New Yorker

She was allowed to do this.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Sexier stuff was allowed, to a point.

News & Media

The New Yorker

No superfluous word was allowed to survive.

News & Media

The Economist
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using synonyms like "was permitted" or "was authorized" to vary your writing and maintain reader engagement.

Common error

Avoid using "was allowed" with plural subjects. The correct form for plural subjects is "were allowed". For example, it should be "They were allowed to leave" not "They was allowed to leave".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was allowed" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that someone or something received permission or was granted the opportunity to do something. Ludwig confirms this usage across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

32%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

5%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was allowed" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that permission was granted in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears frequently in diverse contexts such as news, scientific literature, and general writing. While generally neutral in tone, it's important to maintain subject-verb agreement and consider using synonyms like "was permitted" to enhance writing. Ensure context clarifies who granted permission to avoid ambiguity. By being mindful of these factors, you can effectively use "was allowed" in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "was allowed" in a sentence?

Use "was allowed" to indicate that someone received permission to do something in the past. For example, "She "was allowed to" bring her dog to work today."

What can I say instead of "was allowed"?

You can use alternatives like "was permitted", "was authorized", or "had permission to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was allowed to" or "were allowed to"?

"Was allowed to" is correct for singular subjects, while "were allowed to" is correct for plural subjects. For instance, "He "was allowed to" go home" and "They "were allowed to" leave early".

What's the difference between "was allowed" and "was supposed to"?

"Was allowed" indicates permission to do something, while "was supposed to" indicates an expectation or obligation. For example, "He "was allowed to" eat cake" means he had permission, but "He "was supposed to" eat vegetables" means he should have done so.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: