Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was allowed to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was allowed to" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You may use it when someone or something has been granted permission to do something. For example: The kids were allowed to stay up an hour past their bedtime.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Saddam was allowed to survive.

News & Media

The New Yorker

So I was allowed to stay.

News & Media

The New Yorker

She was allowed to do this.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Sexier stuff was allowed, to a point.

News & Media

The New Yorker

No superfluous word was allowed to survive.

News & Media

The Economist

A reporter was allowed to visit two.

So I was allowed to pass.

News & Media

Independent

Semenya was allowed to keep her medal.

"Pakistan was allowed to go nuclear.

News & Media

The New York Times

The guest was allowed to change rooms.

News & Media

Independent

Nobody was allowed to go in there".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was allowed to" in formal writing, consider whether a more precise term like "authorized" or "permitted" would be more appropriate to convey the specific nuance of the permission granted.

Common error

Avoid using "was allow to" (missing the -ed ending) or mixing up active and passive voice constructions. Ensure that the sentence clearly indicates who or what granted the permission.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

90%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

"Was allowed to" functions as a passive construction indicating permission or authorization. It is typically used to express that someone or something received approval to perform an action, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. This structure is commonly found in news articles, scientific papers, and general writing, providing a clear way to show that an action was permitted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was allowed to" is a very common and grammatically correct passive construction used to indicate that permission or authorization was granted for an action. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread use. It is predominantly found in news and media sources, with a notable presence in scientific writing. When using this phrase, ensure correct tense and voice to avoid grammatical errors. Consider alternatives like "was permitted to" or "had permission to" for slight variations in formality or emphasis. By understanding its function, purpose, and register, you can effectively incorporate "was allowed to" into your writing.

FAQs

What does "was allowed to" mean?

The phrase "was allowed to" indicates that someone or something had permission or was given the opportunity to do something. It signifies that an action was not prohibited and was, in fact, permitted.

How can I use "was allowed to" in a sentence?

You can use "was allowed to" to describe a past situation where permission was granted. For example, "She "was allowed to leave" early because she finished her work."

What are some alternatives to "was allowed to"?

Alternatives include "was permitted to", "had permission to", or "was authorized to". The best choice depends on the specific context and the desired level of formality.

Is there a difference between "was allowed to" and "was able to"?

"Was allowed to" implies permission, whereas "was able to" implies capability or possibility. For example, "He "was allowed to go"" means he had permission, but "He was able to go" means he had the opportunity or capability to go.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

90%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: