was allocated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was allocated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was assigned or distributed to someone or something in the past. Example: "The budget for the project was allocated to various departments based on their needs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The Netherlands was allocated 13.

The New York Times

It was allocated more than £651m.

The Guardian

In 2009, £2.4m was allocated by residents.

The Guardian

(Ultimately, $120.4 million of that was allocated).

The New York Times - Arts

This housing, too, was allocated by race.

The Washington Post

Abedi was allocated a red dot.

The Guardian

The remaining land was allocated for other uses.

The New Yorker

Housing was allocated according to one's rank at the lab.

The Guardian

About half of the issue was allocated to private investors.

The New York Times

However, just $94 million was allocated to Ward 8 schools.

The Washington Post

But only a small patch of ground was allocated.

The Guardian - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing, ensure clarity about who or what is doing the allocating and who or what is receiving the allocation. For example, instead of "Funds were allocated", specify "The committee allocated funds to the project".

Common error

Avoid using a singular subject with "were allocated". For instance, don't write "The fund were allocated"; instead, use "The fund was allocated" or "Funds were allocated."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was allocated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something received an allocation. According to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically sound and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was allocated" is a versatile and commonly used passive voice construction. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and prevalent usage. It's essential to use it with proper subject-verb agreement, and be clear on the recipient of the allocation. It appears most frequently in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts, making it suitable for a range of writing styles. Alternatives like "was assigned" or "was designated" can be used depending on the nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was assigned

This alternative replaces "allocated" with "assigned", maintaining a similar meaning of designating something to a specific purpose or recipient.

was distributed

This emphasizes the act of spreading something out among multiple recipients.

was designated

This option implies a more formal or official assignment compared to "allocated".

was earmarked

This suggests that something was specifically set aside for a particular purpose, often financial resources.

was apportioned

This indicates that something was divided and distributed according to a plan or ratio.

was granted

This suggests a formal or official giving of something, often rights or privileges.

was provided

This alternative simply states that something was made available.

funds were channeled

This is specific to money, and implies the funds are directed to a certain purpose.

resources were committed

This stresses the dedication of resources to a task or project.

received

This focuses on the recipient rather than the action of allocating, implying that something was obtained.

FAQs

How can I use "was allocated" in a sentence?

The phrase "was allocated" indicates that something has been assigned or designated for a particular purpose. For example: "The budget "was allocated" to various departments."

What is a good alternative to "was allocated"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "was assigned", "was designated", or "was earmarked" as alternatives to "was allocated".

Which is correct, "was allocated to" or "was allocated for"?

"Was allocated to" is generally used when specifying the recipient of the allocation (e.g., "The funds were allocated to the project"). "Was allocated for" is used to specify the purpose of the allocation (e.g., "The funds were allocated for research").

Is there a difference between "was allocated" and "was assigned"?

While similar, "was allocated" often implies a distribution or setting aside of resources, while "was assigned" suggests a more general designation or task assignment. The difference is slight and the terms can often be used interchangeably.