was accepted with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was accepted with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was received positively or approved along with something else, often in a formal context. Example: "The proposal was accepted with enthusiasm by the committee, leading to further discussions on its implementation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A calibration curve was accepted with a minimum of 6 out 8 acceptable calibration levels.

Chemistry Central Journal

She was accepted, with a substantial scholarship.

The New Yorker

Yanin's resignation was accepted with little protest.

The New Yorker

In all analyses, significance was accepted with P < 0.05.

Nature

That was accepted with barely a murmur of dissent.

The Guardian - Opinion

The first goal was accepted with an air of expectancy.

The New York Times - Sports

The move was accepted with equanimity by passengers but did not solve the gate delays.

The Guardian - Business

Even after J.R. was accepted with a full scholarship, Mr. White was not done.

The New York Times

Yet often a bogus note was accepted with a knowing wink.

The New York Times - Magazine

Here, Richard Wigglesworth's decision was accepted with the same degree of calm that accompanied Fors's penalty.

Independent

For years, this number was accepted with little public question, probably because nobody cared enough to investigate it.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was accepted with" to convey a sense of formal agreement or approval, often accompanied by a specific condition or sentiment.

Common error

Avoid excessive use of passive constructions like "was accepted with". Opt for active voice where appropriate for a more direct and engaging style. For example, instead of "The proposal was accepted with enthusiasm", try "The committee accepted the proposal enthusiastically".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was accepted with" functions as a passive construction indicating agreement or approval, often followed by a description of the manner or context of the acceptance. Ludwig AI's examples highlight diverse applications in academic research, news reporting, and general communication.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

32%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was accepted with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction that describes how something has been received or approved, often adding details about the context or manner of acceptance. As Ludwig AI confirms, its versatility allows it to appear in various writing styles, though it leans toward more formal registers. Alternatives like "was received with" or "was met with" offer nuanced ways to express similar ideas, depending on the intended emphasis. When using "was accepted with", be mindful of the passive voice and consider active alternatives for a more direct and engaging style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was received with

Expresses how something was welcomed or greeted, focusing on the immediate reaction.

was welcomed with

Similar to 'received with', but puts more emphasis on a friendly or positive greeting.

was met with

Indicates the type of response encountered, emphasizing the interaction or consequence.

was approved with

Focuses on the official endorsement or sanctioning of something, underlining its validity.

was granted with

Highlights that something was formally given or permitted, stressing the authorization aspect.

was embraced with

Suggests a warm and enthusiastic adoption or acceptance, emphasizing the positive reception.

was indulged with

Implies leniency or allowance, often used when something is permitted despite reservations.

was presented with

Focuses on the act of offering or introducing something, setting the stage for its acceptance.

was entrusted with

Highlights the element of trust or responsibility involved in the acceptance.

was favored with

Suggests that something was accepted due to a preference or special consideration.

FAQs

How can I use "was accepted with" in a sentence?

The phrase "was accepted with" is used to indicate the manner in which something was received. For example, "The proposal "was accepted with" enthusiasm" shows a positive reception.

What are some alternatives to "was accepted with"?

Alternatives include "was received with", "was met with", or "was approved with", each carrying slightly different connotations.

Is it correct to use "was accepted by" instead of "was accepted with"?

While both are grammatically correct, "was accepted by" indicates who did the accepting, whereas "was accepted with" describes the manner or accompanying circumstances of the acceptance.

What's the difference between "was accepted with" and "was welcomed with"?

"Was accepted with" often implies a formal agreement or approval, whereas "was welcomed with" suggests a more positive and enthusiastic reception. Choose the phrase that best fits the context.