Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was a waste of time

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was a waste of time" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express that an activity or experience did not yield any valuable results or was unproductive. Example: "The meeting lasted for two hours, but it was a waste of time since we didn't reach any conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"This was a waste of time.

News & Media

The New York Times

But it was a waste of time.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was a waste of time and money.

News & Media

The New York Times

That extra 14 hours was a waste of time.

News & Media

The Economist

So, yes, that was a waste of time and money.

News & Media

Independent

My first degree was a waste of time.

So, 12... Qb6 was a waste of time.

News & Media

The New York Times

Splitting up Microsoft was a waste of time.

News & Media

The New York Times

Everyone thought it was a waste of time.

I don't think it was a waste of time.

News & Media

The New York Times

It was disappointing that it was a waste of time".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider your audience and the level of formality required. While commonly used, alternatives might be more appropriate for formal settings.

Common error

Avoid overuse by replacing it with more descriptive alternatives that provide greater detail about the nature of the inefficiency, such as "was unproductive" or "yielded no results".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was a waste of time" functions as a subjective assessment, expressing the speaker's opinion that an activity lacked value or productivity. Ludwig confirms its common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

74%

Academia

9%

Science

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was a waste of time" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to convey that an activity or experience was unproductive or lacked value. As Ludwig confirms, it appears frequently in news and media, but its register is generally neutral, making it suitable for various contexts, though formal situations may benefit from alternatives. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity about the reasons for its perceived futility and avoid overuse by considering more descriptive alternatives.

FAQs

How can I use "was a waste of time" in a sentence?

You can use "was a waste of time" to express that an activity or event did not produce any valuable results or was unproductive. For example, "Attending that meeting "was a waste of time" because no decisions were made".

What are some alternatives to "was a waste of time"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was a fruitless endeavor", "was an exercise in futility", or "was unproductive", depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "was a waste of time" in formal writing?

While "was a waste of time" is widely understood, it might be considered too informal for some formal contexts. Consider using more professional alternatives like "was inefficient" or "did not yield results" for a more suitable tone.

What makes something "a waste of time"?

An activity can be considered "a waste of time" if it fails to achieve its intended purpose, produces no valuable outcomes, or could have been accomplished more efficiently through other means. It implies a poor allocation of resources, particularly time.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: