Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was a consequence of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was a consequence of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is the result or effect of a particular cause or event. Example: "The delay in the project was a consequence of unforeseen circumstances that arose during the planning phase."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was a consequence of Republican intransigence.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Let's see if it was a consequence of random chance.

The first was a consequence of fluid passing and movement.

That was a consequence of our own play.

In part this was a consequence of democratic impatience.

This enhanced vulnerability was a consequence of their hypomyelination.

In this case, the miracle was a consequence of two tricks plus an observation.

The influence of Spain 1808-1939 in Spanish university circles was a consequence of several factors.

One common view is that Trump's victory was a consequence of pervasive racism in American society.

She denied that the closing was a consequence of the expulsion of the Cubans.

News & Media

The New York Times

What happened to them all was a consequence of their participation.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was a consequence of" to clearly establish a cause-and-effect relationship in your writing. This phrase works well in both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was a consequence of" in sentences where a simpler word like "because" or "due to" would suffice. Overusing the phrase can make your writing sound unnecessarily verbose.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was a consequence of" functions as a causal connector, indicating a direct relationship between a cause and its effect. Ludwig shows this phrase being used to explain results, outcomes, and effects across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was a consequence of" serves as a clear and effective way to express causality in both formal and informal writing. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically sound and widely used. It functions as a causal connector, primarily used in news, scientific, and academic contexts. While versatile, simpler alternatives like "because" or "due to" may be more appropriate in certain simple sentences to avoid unnecessary verbosity. The phrase enjoys broad acceptance and is particularly useful for articulating cause-and-effect relationships in a variety of professional domains. Its high frequency across reputable sources indicates its reliability and effectiveness in conveying causal links.

FAQs

How can I use "was a consequence of" in a sentence?

Use "was a consequence of" to show a direct relationship between an action or event and its result. For example: "The project's delay "was a consequence of" unforeseen circumstances."

What are some alternatives to "was a consequence of"?

You can use alternatives like "resulted from", "stemmed from", or "was caused by" to express a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "was a consequence to" instead of "was a consequence of"?

No, the correct phrasing is "was a consequence of". Using "to" instead of "of" is grammatically incorrect.

What is the difference between "was a consequence of" and "was due to"?

"Was a consequence of" and "was due to" are often interchangeable, but "was a consequence of" might suggest a more indirect or long-term effect, while "was due to" implies a more direct cause.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: