warring factions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'warring factions' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to two or more groups that are in a state of conflict or disagreement. For example, "The two warring factions in the negotiation struggled to reach a compromise."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The party is divided into warring factions.

The Economist

I named some of the warring factions.

The New Yorker

Intolerance can unite otherwise warring factions.

The Economist

Its base, the Democratic Party, had splintered into warring factions.

The New Yorker

Peterson's instinct was to try to reconcile the warring factions.

The New Yorker

The warring factions (mostly) agree that losing is bad.

The Economist

Two warring factions took shape within the Administration.

The New Yorker

The third is to intervene to separate warring factions.

The Guardian

With warring factions, how do you start a dialogue?

Harvard Business Review

Over time, these incentives are applied for former warring factions.

The Washington Post

Cady's potential is spotted by two warring factions.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "warring factions" to describe groups within a larger entity (e.g., political party, organization) that are in strong disagreement or opposition.

Common error

Avoid using "warring factions" when describing simple disagreements or differences of opinion. This phrase implies a high degree of animosity and active conflict, which may not always be accurate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "warring factions" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object within a sentence. It describes multiple groups engaged in active conflict. Ludwig provides numerous examples demonstrating its use in news articles and academic texts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Encyclopedias

11%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Science

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "warring factions" effectively describes groups in active conflict. As demonstrated by Ludwig, it's commonly employed in news and media, encyclopedias, and academic writing to objectively portray situations of hostility and division. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase. While widely used, it's crucial to reserve "warring factions" for situations involving significant animosity and active conflict, avoiding its application to mere disagreements. Alternatives like "conflicting groups" or "opposing sides" may be more appropriate in less intense situations. Understanding the nuances of this phrase will enhance the precision and impact of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Belligerent parties

Directly points to the aggressive and hostile character of involved sides.

Hostile camps

Highlights the inimical disposition between groups, close to active conflict.

Feuding groups

Indicates a long-standing animosity, typically within a close-knit community.

Antagonistic entities

Underlines the active hostility and opposition between distinct organizations.

Conflicting groups

Focuses on the presence of conflict, omitting the implication of active hostility.

Quarreling factions

Denotes a state of discord and disagreement, potentially short of open warfare.

Contending parties

Stresses the act of competition and argument, potentially without explicit violence.

Opposing sides

Highlights the adversarial nature, yet lacks the intensity connoted by "warring".

Rival camps

Emphasizes the competitive positioning and physical or ideological divisions.

Competing interests

Draws attention to the divergence of goals and aims, rather than belligerence.

FAQs

How can I use "warring factions" in a sentence?

You can use "warring factions" to describe groups engaged in conflict, like "The peace talks aim to reconcile the "warring factions" in the region".

What's a good alternative to "warring factions"?

Depending on the context, you could use "conflicting groups", "opposing sides", or "feuding groups" as alternatives to "warring factions".

Is it appropriate to use "warring factions" to describe political parties?

Yes, it's appropriate if the parties are in significant conflict or disagreement. Otherwise, terms like "opposing parties" or "competing parties" might be more suitable.

What distinguishes "warring factions" from "competing factions"?

"Warring factions" implies a higher level of animosity and active conflict, whereas "competing factions" simply suggests that the groups are vying for the same resources or goals without necessarily engaging in open hostility.