vulnerable to litigation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "vulnerable to litigation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or business contexts to describe a situation or entity that is at risk of being sued or facing legal action. Example: "The company is vulnerable to litigation due to its failure to comply with safety regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

If such reviews were not conducted, the agency was vulnerable to litigation, the e-mails said.

The New York Times

Inaccuracy in print is vulnerable to litigation and now the added horror of Lord Justice Leveson.

The Guardian - Opinion

In retrospect, the bank appears to have pursued the two firms in a way that left it vulnerable to litigation.

The New York Times

The company agreed in 1998, but despite repeated warnings that it was vulnerable to litigation, it did little to revamp a highly subjective process by which employees were reviewed and promoted.

The New York Times

Another reason Illinois could be more vulnerable to litigation than other states is that the state law gives the high school association, a nonprofit organization, the task of developing a concussion protocol.

The New York Times - Sports

With Motorola's 24,000-strong patent trove in its arsenal, Android will be much less vulnerable to litigation.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

49 human-written examples

Hospitals and medical staff are leaving themselves very vulnerable to expensive litigation and increased payouts by being slow to change the way the consent process happens.

The Guardian

Despite this, many NHS hospitals do not have systems in place to proactively detect privacy violation – and remain vulnerable to breaches, litigation and regulator fines.

The Guardian

The measure passed the Senate and House unanimously in May and September, but Obama vetoed it last Friday, claiming it would make the US vulnerable to retaliatory litigation in foreign courts that could put American troops in legal jeopardy.

The Guardian

It could encumber innovation and investment and make companies that create technology products vulnerable to costly litigation and attacks by patent trolls.

TechCrunch

Therefore, experts would be more likely to abandon such work than advocates, making them more vulnerable to vexatious litigation.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "vulnerable to litigation", ensure you specify the reason or context for the vulnerability to provide a clear understanding of the risk. For example, "The company is vulnerable to litigation due to its outdated safety protocols".

Common error

Avoid using "vulnerable to litigation" without providing specific reasons or context. Simply stating that a company is "vulnerable to litigation" is vague and uninformative. Always clarify the specific factors that increase the risk of legal action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "vulnerable to litigation" functions as an adjective phrase, describing a state of being at risk of legal action. It modifies a noun, indicating a susceptibility to lawsuits. As Ludwig AI explains, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "vulnerable to litigation" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe situations or entities at risk of legal action. As Ludwig AI confirms, its use is correct and relevant in English writing. The phrase is most frequently found in news and media contexts, with a neutral to professional register. When using this phrase, it's important to specify the reasons for the vulnerability to provide clarity. Alternatives include "at risk of legal challenge" and "exposed to lawsuits". Overall, understanding and properly using "vulnerable to litigation" can enhance the precision and clarity of legal and business communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

at risk of legal challenge

Focuses on the risk aspect, implying potential legal confrontations.

exposed to lawsuits

Highlights the exposure to legal claims or suits.

liable to face legal action

Emphasizes the liability aspect and the potential for legal proceedings.

susceptible to claims

Indicates a sensitivity or openness to legal claims.

open to legal disputes

Suggests a state where legal disputes are likely or possible.

defenseless against legal attacks

Highlights a lack of defense against potential legal challenges.

subject to legal proceedings

Focuses on the legal processes or actions that could occur.

in danger of being sued

Expresses the direct threat of legal action being taken.

prone to legal complications

Suggests a tendency or likelihood of experiencing legal difficulties.

easily challenged in court

Implies that the subject can be readily disputed or contested through legal means.

FAQs

How can I use "vulnerable to litigation" in a sentence?

You can use "vulnerable to litigation" to describe situations or entities that are at risk of being sued or facing legal action. For example, "The organization is "vulnerable to litigation" due to its data security practices."

What are some alternatives to "vulnerable to litigation"?

Some alternatives include "at risk of legal challenge", "exposed to lawsuits", or "liable to face legal action", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct: "vulnerable to litigation" or "vulnerable of litigation"?

"Vulnerable to litigation" is the correct phrase. The preposition "to" is required after "vulnerable" in this context. Using "of" is grammatically incorrect.

What makes a company "vulnerable to litigation"?

A company can be "vulnerable to litigation" for various reasons, including non-compliance with regulations, product defects, breach of contract, or workplace discrimination.