volume to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "volume to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to a measurement or quantity related to volume, but it lacks context to be usable. Example: "The volume to be measured for the experiment was specified in the guidelines."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He estimated its volume to be 100cc.

The New York Times - Sports

A companion volume to "Holes".

The New York Times - Books

The companion volume to the television show.

The New York Times - Books

And there is interior volume to spare.

The New York Times

"But you might have to go from volume to volume to track it".

The New York Times

That brought two-day volume to 21 million warrants.

The New York Times

A lavishly illustrated companion volume to the film.

The New York Times - Books

Turn up the volume to 10 and turn it on.

The New Yorker

"I didn't know what volume to expect," Mr. Merl said.

The New York Times

STILL, this is a good volume to keep handy.

The New York Times

(Bubbles is the first volume to appear in English).

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to the magnitude or quantity of something, specify "volume of" or "amount of volume" for clarity. For example, instead of "enough volume to submerge wings", use "enough volume of liquid to submerge wings".

Common error

Avoid using "volume to" without a clear preposition or context. Instead of saying "turn up the volume to 10", specify "turn up the volume to level 10" or "increase the volume to 10".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "volume to" functions variably depending on the context. Ludwig AI indicates that it requires additional context and is often grammatically incomplete without prepositions or clarifying words. Examples show its use across measurements, adjustments and relations but is better expressed with "volume of".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Wiki

33%

Science

18%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "volume to" appears frequently, Ludwig AI suggests that it often lacks grammatical correctness and requires additional context. The analysis shows it appears across various domains but is best replaced with clearer alternatives like "volume of" or by specifying the intended relationship more explicitly. When writing, prioritize clarity by specifying the kind of volume you're referring to (e.g., "amount of volume") to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

volume of

Indicates the volume belonging to or associated with something.

amount of volume

Specifies a particular quantity or measurement related to volume.

level of volume

Denotes the intensity or degree of volume in a specific context.

degree of volume

Refers to the measure or extent of volume present.

extent of the volume

Refers to the size or scale of a particular volume.

adjust the volume

Indicates modifying or regulating the volume.

capacity of volume

Indicates the maximum amount that can be contained within a volume.

set the volume

Suggests configuring or determining the volume to a certain point.

increase the volume

Suggests raising or augmenting the volume.

decrease the volume

Implies reducing or diminishing the volume.

FAQs

How can I use "volume to" correctly in a sentence?

While "volume to" is often used, it usually requires context or a preposition for clarity. It's better to specify "volume of" or clarify the intended relationship. Consider rewording to enhance precision.

What are some alternatives to using "volume to"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "amount of volume", "level of volume", or rephrase the sentence to use "increase the volume "to"" a certain level.

Is "volume to" grammatically correct?

The phrase "volume to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English. It may be intended to refer to a measurement or quantity related to volume, but it lacks context to be usable. Example: "The volume to be measured for the experiment was specified in the guidelines." Alternatives: "amount of volume" or "volume of".

What's the difference between "volume to" and "volume of"?

"Volume of" clearly indicates possession or association (e.g., "volume of liquid"). "Volume to" is less direct and often requires rephrasing for better clarity. When writing, prefer "volume of" for accuracy.