Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

visibly angry

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"visibly angry" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe someone who is exhibiting physical signs of being angry, such as clenching their fists, raising their voice, or furrowing their brow. For example, "The customer was visibly angry, as his face was turning red and he was raising his voice."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He continued, visibly angry.

News & Media

The Guardian

Justice Scalia grew visibly angry.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Well, of course they add up," he said, visibly angry.

News & Media

The New York Times

I find it incredible," she says, visibly angry.

News & Media

Independent

And he grows more visibly angry when discussing executive pay.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Gina McCarthy deserves a vote," said Ms. Boxer, visibly angry.

News & Media

The New York Times

At this point, the Ranger became visibly angry.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Even simply recounting the incident still makes him visibly angry.

News & Media

The New York Times

Visibly angry, he told them: "You don't like a president?

News & Media

The Guardian

He was visibly angry when asked about Syria.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Prosecutors appeared visibly angry by the sentence, and said they would appeal.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "visibly angry", consider adding specific details about the person's expression or body language to enhance the description, such as "visibly angry, his fists clenched at his sides."

Common error

While "visibly angry" is effective, overuse can diminish its impact. Vary your descriptions with synonyms or more nuanced portrayals of anger to maintain reader engagement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "visibly angry" functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun or pronoun, describing the state of being of someone or something. It emphasizes that the anger is outwardly apparent and easily observable. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "visibly angry" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to describe someone whose anger is outwardly apparent. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for various contexts, particularly in news and media, where conveying a clear emotional state is crucial. To enhance your writing, use specific details to illustrate the anger being described. Remember to avoid overuse by opting for synonyms or other descriptive phrases for emotional states. While "visibly angry" is a common phrase that can be used effectively it's a good practice to check the many examples and alternatives that Ludwig provides, for context.

FAQs

How can I use "visibly angry" in a sentence?

You can use "visibly angry" to describe someone whose anger is apparent through their expressions or actions. For example, "The manager was "visibly angry" after the team missed the deadline."

What are some alternatives to "visibly angry"?

Alternatives include phrases like "clearly irate", "noticeably enraged", or "plainly furious", which offer similar descriptions of observable anger.

Is it redundant to say "visibly angry"? Can anger not be visible?

While anger is often implied through actions, "visibly angry" emphasizes that the anger is outwardly displayed. It clarifies that the person's emotional state is not hidden or subtle.

What's the difference between "visibly angry" and "slightly annoyed"?

"Visibly angry" suggests a strong, easily noticeable level of anger, while "slightly annoyed" indicates a milder, less intense feeling of irritation. The key difference lies in the intensity and the obviousness of the emotion.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: