viewed with suspicion

USAGE SUMMARY

"viewed with suspicion" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you want to describe how someone or something is perceived by another person or group. For example: "The professor's new research was viewed with suspicion by some members of the department."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Outsiders were viewed with suspicion.

The Guardian - Opinion

High salaries are viewed with suspicion.

The New York Times

Contemporary music was viewed with suspicion.

The Guardian - Music

A Japanese newcomer with a camera was viewed with suspicion.

The New Yorker

That which cannot be measured is viewed with suspicion.

The Guardian

In the US, Russian involvement is viewed with suspicion.

The Guardian - Business

This means he is viewed with suspicion on all sides.

The New York Times

Some say visitors have been viewed with suspicion ever since.

Independent

They are chaotic places where Westerners asking about prices are viewed with suspicion.

Princeton University

(Both styles, it is worth noting, have been viewed with suspicion in Africa itself).

The New York Times - Arts

His Mormonism is also likely to feature, a religion viewed with suspicion among Christian evangelicals.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "viewed with suspicion", ensure the context clearly identifies who is holding the suspicion and why. This adds clarity and strength to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "viewed with suspicion" as a cliché. Instead, provide specific reasons or evidence for the suspicion to maintain credibility and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "viewed with suspicion" functions as a descriptive modifier, typically used to indicate how a subject (person, object, or idea) is perceived by others. It conveys a sense of distrust, doubt, or skepticism. As Ludwig AI explains, it is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Academia

11%

Science

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "viewed with suspicion" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe something or someone regarded with distrust or skepticism. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English, highlighting its function as a descriptive modifier. As the examples show, it frequently appears in News & Media, Academia and Science. When using this phrase, clarity is key; make sure the context clearly identifies who holds the suspicion and why. Alternatives like "regarded with distrust" or "perceived with skepticism" can add nuance to your writing. Be mindful not to overuse the phrase without proper justification to maintain the impact of your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

regarded with distrust

Focuses more on the lack of trust rather than just suspicion.

perceived with skepticism

Emphasizes a questioning attitude and doubt.

regarded with wariness

Highlights a cautious and careful approach due to potential danger or problems.

seen with distrust

A more direct and simpler way of expressing the lack of trust.

met with skepticism

Focuses on the reception of something with a skeptical attitude.

treated with doubt

Highlights the act of questioning the truth or reliability of something.

held in suspicion

Indicates a continuous state of being suspected.

looked upon with skepticism

Similar to "perceived with skepticism" but more descriptive.

considered unreliable

Focuses on the perceived lack of reliability, a consequence of suspicion.

distrusted by

A more concise way to indicate a lack of trust.

FAQs

How can I use "viewed with suspicion" in a sentence?

You can use "viewed with suspicion" to describe how a person, object, or idea is regarded with distrust. For example, "The newcomer's motives were "viewed with suspicion" by the established members of the community".

What are some alternatives to "viewed with suspicion"?

Alternatives include "regarded with distrust", "perceived with skepticism", and "regarded with wariness". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "viewed with suspicion" or "regarded with suspicion"?

Both "viewed with suspicion" and "regarded with suspicion" are grammatically correct and have similar meanings. The choice often comes down to personal preference or stylistic consistency within your writing.

What does it mean when something is "viewed with suspicion"?

When something is "viewed with suspicion", it means that it is regarded with distrust or doubt. People may not fully trust it and may be concerned about potential negative consequences.