viewed for comparison

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "viewed for comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the act of examining something in relation to another item or standard to evaluate similarities or differences. Example: "The two reports were viewed for comparison to determine which approach yielded better results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

When a woman is screened for the second time, the reading time per case may be longer if prior mammograms have to be viewed for comparison, thus the potential savings in reading cost by using single reading with CAD may have been underestimated [ 32, 33].

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In order to decipher the location and proportion of genes that could be related to this conflict, the whole transcriptome patterns of both groups were viewed for a direct comparison on the same graph (Fig.  3a).

BMC Genomics

Each generated alignment file can then be viewed individually or all alignment files (along with the original files) can be viewed simultaneously for comparison (Fig. 1B).

Bioinformatics

Analysis of the protein expression using DeCyder-DIA software provided 3-D simulation of the protein spots, allowing an objective view for comparison of spot intensity between the different gels.

Fluids and Barriers of the CNS

Properties and features of the archived fungal genomes are available for viewing and comparison in SNUGB.

BMC Genomics

At the Astrobiology Institute he urged collaboration across disciplines and generations, always taking the long view, for by comparison with the history of the hepatitis virus (observed, at least in its pathology, by the Babylonians), space research was in its infancy.

The Economist

To determine the most selective scaffold, Scaffold Hunter provides the condensed tree map view for the comparison of two isoforms, see Fig. 11.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Repeated DXA scans of the ipsilateral distal femur in lateral view were made for comparison with hip data as a potential surrogate site to substitute for direct hip data.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

The last step for Arms A and B included all views once again for comparison (similar to the first step).

European Radiology

The raw data view enables comparison of the relative activity between elements, whereas the normalized view emphasizes the specificity of positioning for each element.

Bioinformatics

In many applications, images acquired digitally are printed out and viewed on film for ease of viewing locally within the unit, for comparison with subsequent mammographic examinations, and for archiving purposes.

Breast Cancer Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "viewed for comparison", ensure that the items being compared are clearly defined and relevant to each other. This helps provide a focused and meaningful analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "viewed for comparison" without explicitly stating the aspects being compared. This can lead to ambiguity and weaken the analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "viewed for comparison" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to indicate the purpose of examining something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is both correct and usable in written English. Examples show its application in scientific research and general analysis.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "viewed for comparison" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase, especially within scientific and news contexts. Ludwig AI verifies its correctness and utility. The phrase serves to indicate that something is being examined with the specific intention of comparing it to something else. To ensure clarity, it's essential to clearly identify the items and aspects being compared. While alternatives like "examined for comparison" or "analyzed for comparison" exist, "viewed for comparison" maintains a neutral register suitable for diverse analytical scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

examined for comparison

Replaces "viewed" with "examined", emphasizing a closer, more detailed inspection.

analyzed for comparison

Substitutes "viewed" with "analyzed", suggesting a more structured and methodical assessment.

considered for comparison

Changes "viewed" to "considered", implying a deliberate and thoughtful evaluation.

inspected for comparison

Replaces "viewed" with "inspected", highlighting a careful and thorough observation.

evaluated for comparison

Swaps "viewed" with "evaluated", emphasizing a judgment or assessment based on the comparison.

contrasted for comparison

Uses "contrasted" to replace "viewed", focusing explicitly on highlighting the differences.

assessed by comparison

Replaces "viewed" with "assessed", indicating an evaluation of value or quality through comparison.

compared visually

Focuses on the visual aspect of comparison, removing the specific action of 'viewing'.

compared for evaluation

Specifies that the comparison is done for the purpose of evaluation.

viewed in contrast

Emphasizes the act of seeing something in opposition or distinctness to another.

FAQs

How can I use "viewed for comparison" in a sentence?

You can use "viewed for comparison" to describe the act of examining something in relation to another to identify similarities or differences. For example, "The reports were "viewed for comparison" to assess the effectiveness of each strategy".

What are some alternatives to "viewed for comparison"?

Alternatives include "examined for comparison", "analyzed for comparison", or "evaluated for comparison", depending on the specific context and the level of scrutiny involved.

Is it better to say "viewed for comparison" or "compared visually"?

The choice depends on the context. "Viewed for comparison" implies a more general examination with the intent to compare, while "compared visually" specifically highlights the visual aspect of the comparison.

What's the difference between "viewed for comparison" and "considered for comparison"?

"Viewed for comparison" suggests a visual or observational assessment, whereas "considered for comparison" implies a more thoughtful and deliberate evaluation, not necessarily limited to visual aspects.