vetted with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "vetted with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something has been reviewed or approved by someone or a group before proceeding. Example: "The proposal was vetted with the legal team to ensure compliance with regulations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

49 human-written examples

Hamilton had been vetted with care.

The New Yorker

But it's not fair to say everything was vetted with the board".

The New York Times

"I wouldn't think of undertaking an initiative around here that hadn't been vetted with John".

The New York Times

The Bosnia anecdote was part of her prepared remarks, scripted and vetted with her staff.

The New York Times

Now, this theory hasn't been vetted with controlled experiments and testing.

Harvard Business Review

Its radio, television and print ads are aimed at children aged 12-17 and vetted with focus groups.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

11 human-written examples

There's really nothing left to vet with Biden.

HuffPost

"Most vets come to vet school with the orientation of loving, adoring, respecting animals," said Smith-Blackmore.

HuffPost

I have no problem with being vetted.

Huffington Post

The boundaries of carotid plaques were manifested by VET with well-defined edges.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

It usually means a visit to a vet, with poking, prodding and, occasionally, a jab.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "vetted with", clearly specify who or what is doing the vetting to provide context and avoid ambiguity. For example: "The proposal was vetted with the legal team."

Common error

Avoid using "vetted with" in a way that obscures who performed the vetting. Instead of saying "It was vetted with experts", specify "The committee vetted the proposal with industry experts."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "vetted with" functions primarily as a passive verb phrase indicating that a subject has undergone a process of careful examination and approval, often by a specific group or authority. As shown in the Ludwig examples, it commonly appears in sentences describing processes in business, academia, and government.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "vetted with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase that indicates a process of careful examination and approval. As Ludwig AI analysis suggests, it is most frequently encountered in news, academic, and scientific contexts. When using "vetted with", it's important to clearly specify who or what is doing the vetting to avoid ambiguity. While similar to phrases like "reviewed by" or "approved by", "vetted with" often implies a more thorough and critical assessment. Therefore, writers should choose this phrase when they want to emphasize the rigor and legitimacy of a review process.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reviewed by

Focuses on the act of examining something carefully.

assessed by

Highlights the evaluation aspect of the process.

examined by

Emphasizes a thorough inspection.

approved by

Indicates formal acceptance or authorization.

checked by

Implies a verification process for accuracy or correctness.

scrutinized by

Highlights a detailed and critical examination.

evaluated by

Focuses on determining the value or significance.

validated by

Emphasizes confirming the accuracy or legitimacy.

cleared by

Suggests that something has passed inspection without issues.

endorsed by

Implies support or recommendation after review.

FAQs

How can I use "vetted with" in a sentence?

Use "vetted with" to show that something has been carefully examined and approved by someone. For example: "The marketing campaign was "reviewed by" the advertising team before launch."

What are some alternatives to using "vetted with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as ""reviewed by"", "assessed by", or "approved by" to convey a similar meaning.

Is there a difference between "vetted with" and "reviewed by"?

While similar, "vetted with" often implies a more thorough and potentially critical examination than simply being ""reviewed by"". Vetting suggests a deeper level of scrutiny.

When is it appropriate to use "vetted with" in formal writing?

"Vetted with" is suitable for formal writing when you need to emphasize the process of careful examination and approval, especially in contexts involving risk assessment or compliance. Using it in a legal context, for example, is appropriate.