veiled hazards

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "veiled hazards" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe dangers or risks that are not immediately obvious or are hidden from view. Example: "The project seemed promising, but there were veiled hazards that could jeopardize its success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Women are veiled.

The New York Times

Others wore veiled masks.

The New York Times

She too is veiled.

Yale University

But she is veiled.

Yale University

Every woman was veiled.

Columbia University

All the women were veiled.

The New Yorker

(And even that is veiled).

The New Yorker

Things were less veiled.

The New York Times

Everything about it breathes veiled discretion.

Independent

Martha went around veiled.

The New Yorker

They cannot be veiled.

The Guardian - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "veiled hazards" to create a sense of mystery or intrigue, suggesting deeper, less obvious dangers are present.

Common error

Avoid using "veiled hazards" when the dangers are already well-known or obvious. The phrase works best when suggesting hidden or less apparent risks, not commonly recognized ones.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "veiled hazards" is to act as a noun phrase where "veiled" modifies "hazards". It describes the nature of the hazards, indicating they are hidden or not immediately obvious. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Academia

25%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "veiled hazards" is a grammatically sound noun phrase used to describe dangers or risks that are not immediately apparent. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and suitable for written English, often employed to create a sense of mystery or caution. While not exceedingly common, it appears in various contexts including news, academia, and general writing, making it versatile. Alternatives such as "hidden dangers" and "concealed risks" offer similar meanings, and using the phrase effectively involves ensuring clarity in the surrounding context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

hidden dangers

Replaces "veiled" with "hidden", focusing on the concealed aspect of the dangers.

concealed risks

Substitutes both words, emphasizing the risks are deliberately hidden or not easily noticeable.

latent threats

Replaces "veiled" with "latent", highlighting that the threats are present but not yet active or fully developed.

unseen perils

Emphasizes the lack of visibility of the dangers involved.

subtle dangers

Focuses on the understated and often overlooked nature of the hazards.

covert risks

Highlights that the risks are secretly or discreetly present.

disguised dangers

Suggests that the dangers are deliberately masked or misrepresented.

implicit hazards

Implies that the hazards are understood but not directly expressed or stated.

obscured perils

Focuses on the idea that the perils are not easily seen or understood because they are covered or hidden.

underlying risks

Highlights that risks are fundamental or foundational but not immediately obvious.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "veiled hazards" in a sentence?

To effectively use "veiled hazards", ensure the sentence clearly establishes the context in which the dangers are hidden or not immediately obvious. For example, "The seemingly straightforward business plan contained "veiled hazards" that could undermine its success".

What are some alternatives to "veiled hazards"?

You can use alternatives like "hidden dangers", "concealed risks", or "latent threats" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

What does "veiled hazards" imply that "dangers" alone does not?

"Veiled hazards" implies that the dangers are not immediately apparent or are hidden from view, whereas "dangers" simply indicates the presence of potential harm without specifying its visibility.

Is it appropriate to use "veiled hazards" in formal writing?

Yes, "veiled hazards" is appropriate for formal writing, particularly when discussing complex situations where risks may not be immediately evident. However, ensure the tone and context align with the level of formality required.