vast cost

USAGE SUMMARY

"vast cost" is correct and usable in written English.
You could use it to describe a large financial expenditure, such as in the sentence, "The renovation of the old building was a vast cost for the company."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

43 human-written examples

Public sector infrastructure projects have vast cost overruns.

The Guardian - Opinion

An even bigger question is the vast cost of decommissioning and waste disposal.

The Guardian

Do you believe engineers have abolished the vast cost overruns of existing generations of reactors?

The Guardian

It also needs to be marketed, with customers secured upfront to finance the vast cost of extraction at scale.

The Economist

The owners have insisted that they need vast cost reductions to address a reported $300 million in annual losses.

The New York Times - Sports

This was a crisis made in America and deepened by the vast cost of its multiple wars.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

17 human-written examples

Some births in hospital can go wrong too, as the vast costs of clinical negligence illustrate.

Independent

Vast costs were incurred in the struggle to turn Chrysler around but last year it returned to profit.

The Economist

The economic case for space exploration has always been important, because of the vast costs and the indeterminate benefits.

The New Yorker

He contends that the internationally agreed Kyoto targets for reducing carbon dioxide emissions will impose vast costs for little result.

The New York Times - Science

This year's record wet winter will focus attention on the potentially vast costs of dealing with and preventing floods.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "vast cost" when you want to emphasize the scale of expenditure, especially when it might be surprisingly high or create a significant financial challenge.

Common error

Avoid using "vast cost" as a generic descriptor for any expense. Reserve it for situations where the cost is genuinely substantial and has a significant impact; otherwise, opt for more precise language.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "vast cost" functions as a noun phrase, where 'vast' modifies 'cost'. It serves to quantify and emphasize the magnitude of an expense Ludwig AI suggests it is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "vast cost" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression to describe a significant financial burden. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. Predominantly found in News & Media, Science and Formal & Business contexts, this phrase serves to highlight the substantial financial implications of various projects, events, or decisions. When using "vast cost", it's crucial to quantify the expense and use it appropriately when the cost is genuinely substantial. Alternatives like "substantial expense" or "significant expenditure" can be used depending on the specific context and desired emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

substantial expense

Replaces 'cost' with 'expense' emphasizing financial outlay and replaces vast with substantial.

significant expenditure

Uses 'expenditure' instead of 'cost', highlighting the act of spending and significant replaces vast.

considerable price

Substitutes 'cost' with 'price', referring to the amount of money exchanged for something and replaces vast with considerable.

high financial burden

Replaces 'vast cost' with a phrase emphasizing the financial strain or weight caused by the cost.

major economic outlay

Uses 'outlay' instead of 'cost' to indicate the spending of money, and major instead of vast.

expensive undertaking

Changes the phrase to describe an activity or project that is costly, instead of naming a generic 'cost'.

sizeable investment

Focuses on the aspect of investing money, with 'sizeable' indicating a large amount and replaces vast with sizeable.

heavy toll

This alternative is more figurative emphasizing the detrimental impact or strain of the cost, rather than the monetary value alone.

large capital commitment

Emphasizes the capital investment aspect, indicating a significant allocation of financial resources with large instead of vast.

huge economic impact

Shifts the focus to the economic consequences of the cost, rather than the cost itself and using huge instead of vast.

FAQs

How can I use "vast cost" in a sentence?

You can use "vast cost" to describe significant expenses related to projects, operations, or unexpected events. For example, "The construction of the new bridge incurred a "vast cost" due to unforeseen environmental challenges".

What are some alternatives to "vast cost"?

Alternatives to "vast cost" include "substantial expense", "significant expenditure", or "considerable price", depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "vast cost" in formal writing?

Yes, "vast cost" is appropriate for formal writing when accurately describing a large financial burden. However, ensure that the magnitude of the cost justifies the use of "vast".

What's the difference between "vast cost" and "huge cost"?

"Vast cost" and "huge cost" are similar, but "vast" often implies a greater scale or scope, suggesting that the cost impacts many aspects or areas. "Huge" simply emphasizes the large amount of money involved.