Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

validated to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validated to" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts where something has been confirmed or verified against a standard or requirement. Example: "The results of the experiment were validated to ensure accuracy and reliability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This method has been validated to meet FDA validation guidelines.

"It validated to other investors that it was something they should start considering and evaluating".

News & Media

The Guardian

They are desperate to be validated, to be praised, to be told they are worth something.

News & Media

The Guardian

The developed model was validated to simulate groundwater quality.

The scale has been validated to portuguese [15].

The method was validated to analyze the rhubarb material.

It was experimentally validated to limestone walls 20 cm thick.

Compounds 3 and 4 were experimentally validated to be significantly active against M. luteus.

Prior to analysis of the samples, the ELISA method was validated to ensure data quality.

The developed method was validated to ensure the compliance in accordance with ICH guidelines.

This scale was validated to Turkish by Akin et al. [39].

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validated to", ensure that you clearly specify what standard, criteria, or purpose the subject has been validated against. This provides context and strengthens the statement.

Common error

Avoid using "validated to" without clearly defining the scope or parameters of the validation. For instance, instead of saying "The method was validated to be accurate", specify "The method was validated to be accurate within a range of ±5%".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validated to" serves as a verb phrase indicating that something has undergone a process of verification or confirmation against a particular standard, requirement, or purpose. Ludwig's examples confirm its usage in academic, scientific, and general contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "validated to" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to convey that something has been verified or confirmed against specific criteria. According to Ludwig, it frequently appears in scientific and academic writing to assert reliability and accuracy. When using this phrase, it's crucial to specify the standards or purposes of the validation to maintain clarity. While the examples provided by Ludwig are extensive and confirm its correctness, remember to avoid overgeneralization and always provide context. Alternative phrases like "confirmed for" or "verified for" can be used for variety, but the key is to maintain precision and clarity in your writing.

FAQs

How is "validated to" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "validated to" is commonly used to indicate that something has been confirmed or verified against a specific standard, requirement, or purpose. For instance, "The software was "validated to" meet industry security standards".

What are some alternatives to using "validated to"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "confirmed for", "verified for", or "attested to" to express a similar meaning.

Is "validated to" grammatically correct?

Yes, "validated to" is grammatically correct when used to indicate that something has been confirmed or verified against a standard or purpose. However, ensure that the sentence structure is clear and the object of validation is clearly stated.

What's the difference between ""validated to"" and "certified for"?

"Validated to" generally means something has been checked and proven accurate or effective for a specific purpose. "Certified for", on the other hand, implies that an entity has officially met certain standards or requirements set by an authority.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: