Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

validate with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "validate with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the process of confirming or verifying something with a specific source or authority. Example: "Before proceeding with the project, please validate with the compliance team to ensure all regulations are met."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

29 human-written examples

Which is what some people wanted to happen, to do nothing and validate with silence and inaction 25 years of land takeovers".

News & Media

The New York Times

Then, according to the existing reassociation procedure, CH21 has to validate with CH22.

A nonlinear finite element technique was developed and validate with the experimental results.

Numerical analysis was performed in LS-DYNA to further validate with the developed analytical models.

The presented model is also reduced to flat web to validate with an existing study.

The data measured in our previous experimental study were employed to validate with the simulation result.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

Selected genes were validated with qRT-PCR.

This software has been validated with prototypes.

These solutions validated with NSGA-II.

This model is validated with diagnostic checking.

The simulations are validated with experimental data.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "validate with", ensure you clearly specify the source, method, or criteria against which the validation is being performed for clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid claiming something is validated without providing external evidence or a credible source to support your claim. Independent verification strengthens your argument.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validate with" functions as a verb phrase that indicates the act of confirming or verifying something by comparing it to a specific source, standard, or method. Ludwig's examples show its common usage in contexts requiring confirmation against external data.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

14%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "validate with" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to describe the act of verifying information against a specific source or standard. As Ludwig AI clarifies, it is particularly useful when needing to demonstrate the rigor and process of confirmation. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, using "validate with" effectively communicates a commitment to accuracy and reliability. While variations like "confirm with" or "verify with" offer subtle shifts in meaning, "validate with" remains a strong choice for emphasizing a formal or methodical approach to validation.

FAQs

How do I use "validate with" in a sentence?

Use "validate with" to indicate that something is being confirmed or verified using a specific source or method. For example, "We need to "validate with" the engineering team before proceeding".

What are some alternatives to "validate with"?

Alternatives include "confirm with", "verify with", or "authenticate with", depending on the specific context and the type of validation being performed.

Is it better to use "validate with" or simply "validate"?

"Validate" on its own implies a general act of confirmation. Using "validate with" is better when you want to specifically mention the tool, person, or method used to perform validation, adding specificity to the statement.

In what contexts is "validate with" most appropriate?

"Validate with" is appropriate in contexts where formal verification is required, such as in scientific research, software testing, or regulatory compliance. It clarifies the standard against which something is being checked.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

80%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: