Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
validate with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "validate with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the process of confirming or verifying something with a specific source or authority. Example: "Before proceeding with the project, please validate with the compliance team to ensure all regulations are met."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
29 human-written examples
Which is what some people wanted to happen, to do nothing and validate with silence and inaction 25 years of land takeovers".
News & Media
Then, according to the existing reassociation procedure, CH21 has to validate with CH22.
A nonlinear finite element technique was developed and validate with the experimental results.
Numerical analysis was performed in LS-DYNA to further validate with the developed analytical models.
Science
The presented model is also reduced to flat web to validate with an existing study.
Science
The data measured in our previous experimental study were employed to validate with the simulation result.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
31 human-written examples
Selected genes were validated with qRT-PCR.
Science
This software has been validated with prototypes.
Science
These solutions validated with NSGA-II.
This model is validated with diagnostic checking.
The simulations are validated with experimental data.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "validate with", ensure you clearly specify the source, method, or criteria against which the validation is being performed for clarity and credibility.
Common error
Avoid claiming something is validated without providing external evidence or a credible source to support your claim. Independent verification strengthens your argument.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "validate with" functions as a verb phrase that indicates the act of confirming or verifying something by comparing it to a specific source, standard, or method. Ludwig's examples show its common usage in contexts requiring confirmation against external data.
Frequent in
Science
61%
News & Media
14%
Wiki
3%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "validate with" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to describe the act of verifying information against a specific source or standard. As Ludwig AI clarifies, it is particularly useful when needing to demonstrate the rigor and process of confirmation. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, using "validate with" effectively communicates a commitment to accuracy and reliability. While variations like "confirm with" or "verify with" offer subtle shifts in meaning, "validate with" remains a strong choice for emphasizing a formal or methodical approach to validation.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
confirm with
Focuses on establishing the truth or correctness of something, similar to validating but often implies a simpler check.
verify with
Emphasizes the process of checking accuracy or truth, closely aligned with validating.
authenticate with
Highlights establishing something as genuine, which is a specific type of validation.
substantiate with
Implies providing evidence to support or prove something, a more forceful form of validation.
corroborate with
Suggests strengthening or supporting an idea or finding with additional evidence.
affirm with
Emphasizes stating something is true, which can be a part of the validation process.
ascertain with
Focuses on finding something out for certain, which can lead to validation.
test with
Implies a more active form of validation, involving a trial or experiment.
endorse with
Highlights giving official approval or support, a broader action than pure validation.
reinforce with
Suggests making something stronger, where validation may be a means of reinforcement.
FAQs
How do I use "validate with" in a sentence?
Use "validate with" to indicate that something is being confirmed or verified using a specific source or method. For example, "We need to "validate with" the engineering team before proceeding".
What are some alternatives to "validate with"?
Alternatives include "confirm with", "verify with", or "authenticate with", depending on the specific context and the type of validation being performed.
Is it better to use "validate with" or simply "validate"?
"Validate" on its own implies a general act of confirmation. Using "validate with" is better when you want to specifically mention the tool, person, or method used to perform validation, adding specificity to the statement.
In what contexts is "validate with" most appropriate?
"Validate with" is appropriate in contexts where formal verification is required, such as in scientific research, software testing, or regulatory compliance. It clarifies the standard against which something is being checked.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested