valid reasoning

USAGE SUMMARY

"valid reasoning" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a thought process that is based on logical and sound evidence. For example, "In order to make an informed decision on the issue, one must consider all the facts and use valid reasoning."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

Writing 1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.

The New York Times

(How well did each "write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence," for instance?) Create a Student or Community Version of Room for Debate Is there an interesting controversy in your school or community right now?

The New York Times

(7) The fallacy of non sequitur ("it does not follow") occurs when there is not even a deceptively plausible appearance of valid reasoning, because there is an obvious lack of connection between the given premises and the conclusion drawn from them.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The false conclusion arises by apparently valid reasoning from apparently true premises.

SEP

What do the mathematical results reported below have to do with the original philosophical issues concerning valid reasoning?

SEP

According to Śāntarakṣita the argument from neither-one-nor many satisfies the triple criteria of valid reasoning.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

✓ Ratiocination: developing a chain of premises leading to a valid conclusion (reasoning).

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education

Rules of inference would be formulated to explain what one takes to be valid scientific reasoning, much as one might formulate deductive inference rules to explain valid inferences of mathematicians.

SEP

Taking valid deductive reasoning to be the reliable extraction of information from information already obtained, Barwise and Etchemendy (1996:4) pose the following question: Why cannot the representations composing a proof be visual as well as linguistic?

SEP

Therefore, based on his thoughts, thinking can be considered as: ✓ Doxa: forming an opinion or having an idea (opining) ✓ Vorstellen: representing a state of affairs (representing) ✓ Ratiocination: developing a chain of premises leading to a valid conclusion (reasoning) ✓ Problem-solving: scientific thinking (problem-solving) ✓ Beriff (Hegel): conceptual or systematic thinking (conceiving).

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education

Logic does not deal with the particular cases, but only with the most generally valid forms of reasoning or inference, ones that are valid no matter what one reasons about.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When constructing an argument, always ensure that your premises are true and that your reasoning follows logically from those premises to achieve "valid reasoning".

Common error

Avoid assuming that because two things are correlated, one causes the other. "Valid reasoning" requires establishing a causal link, not just observing a relationship.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "valid reasoning" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where 'valid' modifies 'reasoning' to indicate that the reasoning process adheres to logical principles and sound premises. Ludwig AI confirms this through its analysis of numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "valid reasoning" signifies a sound and logical thought process. As Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, particularly in science, news, and encyclopedias. It's crucial to distinguish it from persuasive reasoning, which may not always adhere to strict logical principles. When using this phrase, ensure that your premises are true and your conclusions follow logically. Remember that correlation doesn't equal causation to maintain "valid reasoning".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sound reasoning

Emphasizes the reliability and robustness of the reasoning process.

logical reasoning

Focuses on the adherence to principles of logic.

cogent reasoning

Highlights the convincing and persuasive nature of the reasoning.

rational thinking

Broadens the scope to encompass the overall thought process.

well-founded reasoning

Stresses that the reasoning is based on solid evidence or principles.

reasoned argument

Shifts the focus to the presentation of reasoning in an argumentative context.

justifiable reasoning

Highlights the defensibility and acceptability of the reasoning process.

evidence-based reasoning

Specifies that the reasoning is grounded in empirical evidence.

defensible logic

Focuses on defending the logical argument used.

reasoning based on facts

Highlights the factual basis of the reasoning.

FAQs

How can I use "valid reasoning" in a sentence?

"Valid reasoning" is used to describe a logical and sound thought process. For example, "The conclusion was based on "valid reasoning" and empirical evidence."

What are some synonyms for "valid reasoning"?

Alternatives to "valid reasoning" include "sound reasoning", "logical reasoning", or "rational thinking".

What makes reasoning "valid"?

Reasoning is considered "valid" when the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

How does "valid reasoning" differ from "persuasive reasoning"?

"Valid reasoning" focuses on the logical structure of an argument, while persuasive reasoning aims to convince an audience, even if the logic isn't perfectly sound. One can have "persuasive reasoning" without necessarily having "valid reasoning", and vice versa.