valid demarcation

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "valid demarcation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a clear distinction or boundary that is recognized as legitimate or acceptable in a particular context. Example: "The scientist proposed a valid demarcation between science and pseudoscience to clarify the criteria for scientific inquiry."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Venezuela is also especially notable because its new demarcation law also recognizes indigenous self-demarcation as a valid part of the land regularization and titling process (Sendas, 2001; Colchester, Silva and Tomedes, 2004: pp. 36 - 37).

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

Demarcation point (DP).

Cornell University

No class demarcation intended.

The Guardian - Opinion

Early scientists defied that demarcation.

The New York Times - Science

The line of demarcation is not clear.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Valid question.

The New Yorker

There are no rigid demarcation lines.

The Guardian

Good luck finding the line of demarcation.

The Washington Post

Make colour work harder than for demarcation.

The Guardian - Opinion

There is no line of demarcation.

The New York Times

These issues transcend the traditional demarcation lines.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using "valid demarcation" in formal writing to denote a formal or officially recognized boundary. If the context is informal, consider a more colloquial term such as "fair split".

Common error

Avoid using "valid demarcation" without specifying whose perspective validates the boundary. A demarcation may be valid for one group but not for another, so clarity is crucial to prevent misunderstanding.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "valid demarcation" functions as a noun phrase, where "valid" is an adjective modifying the noun "demarcation". It refers to a boundary or distinction that is recognized as legitimate or acceptable within a particular context. Based on Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "valid demarcation" is a grammatically sound noun phrase used to describe a boundary or distinction that is recognized as legitimate. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. While not frequently used, it is most applicable in formal and scientific contexts where precision is key. Related phrases include "legitimate distinction" and "acceptable boundary". When employing this phrase, ensure you clarify whose perspective validates the demarcation to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

legitimate distinction

Emphasizes the legitimacy and recognition of a distinction.

acceptable boundary

Focuses on a boundary that is considered permissible or satisfactory.

recognized separation

Highlights the acknowledgement of a divide or separation.

justifiable delineation

Stresses the defensible and reasonable nature of a boundary.

sound differentiation

Implies a solid and well-founded difference.

authorized division

Highlights that the division is approved or sanctioned.

permissible distinction

Focuses on the allowance or acceptance of a difference.

validated separation

Stresses that the separation has been confirmed or proven.

appropriate distinction

Focuses on the suitability of the difference.

well-founded boundary

Emphasizes that the boundary is based on solid reasoning or evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "valid demarcation" in a sentence?

You can use "valid demarcation" to describe a boundary or distinction that is recognized as legitimate or acceptable, for example: "The scientist proposed a "valid demarcation" between science and pseudoscience to clarify the criteria for scientific inquiry."

What phrases are similar to "valid demarcation"?

Alternatives include "legitimate distinction", "acceptable boundary", or "recognized separation", each emphasizing a slightly different aspect of recognition and legitimacy.

Is "valid demarcation" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, "valid demarcation" is suitable for formal writing, particularly in academic, scientific, or legal contexts where precise and recognized boundaries are important. In informal writing, more casual alternatives might be more fitting.

What makes a demarcation "valid"?

A demarcation is considered "valid" when it meets established criteria or standards of recognition and acceptance within a specific context. This could be based on scientific evidence, legal precedent, or social agreement.