valid arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "valid arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing reasoning, logic, or debate, indicating that the arguments presented are sound and acceptable. Example: "In the debate, both sides presented valid arguments that were well-supported by evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

These influential writers all bring up some valid arguments about problematic ideas presented in the book.

The Guardian

But there are some valid arguments against banning exclusivity deals altogether.

The New York Times - Tech

Certainly, German literary critics, who are nearly universally against the changes, have valid arguments.

The New Yorker

However, the Dragons could have had very valid arguments for two forward passes in the movement.

The Guardian - Sport

"This kind of stuff belittles all these valid arguments," Mr. Sutich said.

The New York Times

It's not that some of these approaches never provide valid arguments.

The New Yorker

There are valid arguments to be made about not treating rape differently to other crimes.

The Guardian - Opinion

Unlike Professor Buiter, I recognise that these could be valid arguments in the current circumstances.

The Economist

There are valid arguments for euro entry (and arguments against, which I think win on balance).

The New York Times

Realitarians base their conclusions on facts and valid arguments, regardless of where they sit on the political spectrum.

The New York Times

Injunctions are not set in stone; they can be challenged where there are valid arguments put before a judge as to why.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "valid arguments", ensure they are supported by evidence, logical reasoning, and credible sources. This strengthens their persuasiveness and reliability.

Common error

Avoid substituting emotional appeals for "valid arguments". While emotions can be persuasive, they should complement, not replace, logical reasoning and evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "valid arguments" functions as an adjective-noun combination, where "valid" modifies "arguments" to indicate that they are sound, logical, and well-supported. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

3%

Unknown

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "valid arguments" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe logical and well-supported points in a discussion. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is widely used across diverse contexts, including news, science, and encyclopedias. To enhance clarity and persuasiveness, ensure your "valid arguments" are substantiated by evidence and logical reasoning. While emotional appeals can complement your arguments, they should not replace the logical foundation. Alternatives such as "sound reasoning" or "cogent arguments" can be used to add nuance. Be careful when replacing because they don't have the exact same meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sound reasoning

Focuses on the reasoning process itself being sound rather than the arguments.

cogent arguments

Emphasizes the clarity and persuasiveness of the arguments.

well-founded arguments

Highlights the solid basis or foundation of the arguments.

justifiable claims

Shifts the focus to the claims being defended as justifiable.

legitimate points

Replaces "arguments" with "points", suggesting specific items in a discussion.

defensible positions

Highlights the ability to defend or uphold the arguments presented.

tenable contentions

Emphasizes that the claims are maintainable or defensible against attack or objection.

strong rationale

Stresses the logical basis and justification behind a decision or belief.

reasoned discourse

Indicates the broader context of logical and thoughtful conversation.

substantiated assertions

Highlights that the claims are supported by evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "valid arguments" in a sentence?

You can use "valid arguments" to describe well-reasoned points in a discussion, such as, "The lawyer presented "valid arguments" to support his client's case."

What can I say instead of "valid arguments"?

Alternatives include "sound reasoning", "cogent arguments", or "well-founded arguments", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What makes an argument "valid"?

An argument is considered "valid" when its premises logically support its conclusion. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

How do "valid arguments" differ from persuasive ones?

"Valid arguments" are logically sound, whereas persuasive arguments may rely on rhetoric or emotional appeal. While persuasion aims to convince, validity focuses on logical structure.