updated by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "updated by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate who has made changes or modifications to a document, system, or piece of information. Example: "The report was updated by the research team to include the latest findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

History books shld be updated by morning.

The New Yorker

Revised and updated by Martha White.

The New York Times

AOL Journals can be updated by using AOL Instant Messenger.

The New York Times - Tech

DARWIN'S GHOST: "The Origin of Species" Updated, by Steve Jones.

The New York Times - Books

The concept is Vitruvian as updated by Leonardo.

The New York Times - Arts

The family is updated by electronic report every morning.

The New York Times

This piece has been updated by Michael McNay.

The Guardian - Arts

It's updated by the Red Hot Chili Peppers.

The New York Times - Arts

The 1800 play by Friedrich Schiller has been updated by Peter Oswald.

The New York Times

"Emily Post's Etiquette" is still in print, updated by Peggy Post, her great-granddaughter-in-law.

The New York Times - Books

That figure is about 1,800 fewer than the list updated by the city.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When attributing updates, clearly specify who or what performed the update. This enhances transparency and accountability.

Common error

Avoid vague statements about updates without specifying the source. For example, instead of saying "The data was updated", specify "The data was "updated by" the research team".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "updated by" functions as a passive construction indicating agency in the process of updating. Ludwig AI examples show it is used to attribute changes or modifications to a specific entity, as in "The report was "updated by" the research team."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

58%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "updated by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that specifies the agent responsible for making updates or modifications. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is considered correct and usable. It is versatile, appearing in diverse contexts from news to scientific publications. When using "updated by", it's crucial to clearly identify the updating entity to ensure transparency. Alternative phrases like "revised by" or "modified by" can be used depending on the context's nuance. By following these guidelines, you can use "updated by" effectively in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

revised by

This alternative suggests a more thorough modification than a simple update.

modified by

This indicates a change made to something, often implying alterations to its form or function.

amended by

This suggests a formal alteration, typically to a document or set of rules.

corrected by

This implies that errors were fixed and changes were made to ensure accuracy.

edited by

This focuses on improvements made to the content, style, or presentation of something.

overhauled by

This suggests a complete renovation or significant transformation.

adapted by

This implies changes made to suit a new purpose or condition.

refined by

This indicates subtle improvements made to enhance the quality or precision.

enhanced by

This suggests that the original was improved or made better.

improved by

This is a more general term indicating positive changes were made.

FAQs

How can I use "updated by" in a sentence?

Use "updated by" to indicate who or what made changes to something. For example: "The report was "updated by" the marketing team".

What's the difference between "updated by" and "revised by"?

"Updated by" generally indicates that changes were made to include new information, whereas "revised by" suggests a more thorough modification or correction.

Which is more appropriate, "updated by" or "modified by"?

Both are acceptable, but "updated by" often implies new information, while "modified by" suggests altering the form or function.

What can I say instead of "updated by"?

Consider using alternatives like "revised by", "amended by", or "corrected by" depending on the context.