revised by

USAGE SUMMARY

"revised by" can be used in written English.
It is used to indicate that something has been checked and corrected. For example, "This document was revised by the editor before being published."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Revised by P. H. Nidditch.

The New York Times

The book was revised by Harvey Fierstein.

The New Yorker

Morley, S. revised by Bainerd, G.

Nature

Third edition, revised by Albert Hansen.

Nature

Second edition revised by P. H. Greenwood.

Nature

Revised by Miss M. L. Green.

Nature

Second edition, revised by A. R. Taylor.

University of California, Berkeley

Planimetric detail revised by photo-planimetric methods.

Stanford University

Subchapter II, as revised by Pub.

Cornell University

It has been revised by his widow, Margaret Hebblethwaite.

The Guardian

The article was reviewed and revised by another researcher (S.M.).

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When attributing revisions, specify the reviser's expertise to add credibility. For instance, "The manuscript was revised by Dr. Smith, a leading expert in the field."

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive constructions like "revised by" when active voice provides clarity and directness. Instead of "The report was revised by the committee", consider "The committee revised the report".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "revised by" functions as a passive construction, attributing the act of revision to a specific agent. It indicates who performed the alterations or corrections on a particular piece of work. Ludwig showcases numerous examples where documents, articles, and manuscripts undergo this process.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

32%

Academia

26%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "revised by" is a versatile phrase used to attribute modifications or corrections to a specific agent, according to Ludwig's analysis. It's grammatically correct and particularly common in academic, scientific, and news contexts. While "revised by" is a common construction, be mindful of passive voice overuse and specify the reviser's expertise for added credibility. Alternative phrases like "edited by" or "amended by" may be more suitable depending on the context. The frequent use across credible sources confirms it as a reliable phrase in formal and informal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

amended by

Implies a formal or legal change, often smaller adjustments.

edited by

Focuses on improving clarity, style, and accuracy, more common in writing contexts.

corrected by

Highlights the fixing of errors or mistakes.

adapted by

Suggests modification to suit a new purpose or condition.

modified by

A general term for making changes or alterations.

updated by

Implies bringing something current or more modern.

overhauled by

Suggests a comprehensive and thorough revision.

reworked by

Indicates significant changes or improvements were made.

re-evaluated by

Implies the material was assessed again and then revised based on the new evaluation.

re-examined by

Suggests a careful and detailed inspection leading to revisions.

FAQs

How can I use "revised by" in a sentence?

Use "revised by" to indicate who made changes to a document or work. For example, "The article was "edited by" a professional editor before publication" or "The software was "updated by" the development team".

What are some alternatives to "revised by"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "edited by", "amended by", "updated by", or "corrected by" to convey the same meaning.

Is it better to say "revised by" or "edited by"?

The choice between "revised by" and "edited by" depends on the context. "Revised by" suggests more significant or structural changes, while "edited by" often implies improvements in clarity, style, and accuracy.

What's the difference between "revised by" and "proofread by"?

"Revised by" suggests making significant changes to content, structure, or style. "Proofread by", on the other hand, indicates a final check for errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation.