Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
unwarranted revisions
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "unwarranted revisions" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe changes or edits that are not justified or necessary, often in the context of documents, manuscripts, or proposals. Example: "The editor made several unwarranted revisions to the original manuscript, altering the author's intended message."
✓ Grammatically correct
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Consequently, the current preoccupation with autonomy as a singular marker of 'respect for persons' and its pre-eminence among the four bioethical principles is unwarranted and calls for revision [ 50, 85, 120].
Science
Was that comparison unwarranted?
News & Media
"The criticism was unwarranted.
News & Media
Tightening now is unwarranted.
News & Media
The gripe is unwarranted.
Academia
This may be unwarranted.
News & Media
Her concern is unwarranted.
Their complaints are unwarranted.
News & Media
Those doubts aren't unwarranted.
News & Media
Whatever; his confidence was unwarranted.
News & Media
The criticism isn't unwarranted.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "unwarranted revisions", ensure the context clearly demonstrates why the changes are unnecessary or unjustified. Provide specific examples to support your claim.
Common error
Be mindful that "unwarranted revisions" aren't always detrimental. Sometimes, what seems unnecessary at first glance might reveal unforeseen benefits upon closer inspection. A balanced perspective is key.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "unwarranted revisions" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "unwarranted" modifies the noun "revisions". It describes changes or edits that are not justified, necessary, or appropriate. Based on Ludwig's analysis, the phrase is grammatically correct.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "unwarranted revisions" refers to changes that are unnecessary or lack justification. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English, although example sentences are currently unavailable. Alternatives include "unjustified alterations" and "needless modifications". When using the phrase, ensure the context clearly indicates why the changes are inappropriate. Keep in mind that some changes may seem unnecessary but could bring unseen value.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Unjustified alterations
Replaces "revisions" with "alterations" and "unwarranted" with "unjustified", maintaining a formal tone.
Needless modifications
Substitutes "revisions" with "modifications" and "unwarranted" with "needless", indicating that the changes are unnecessary.
Unnecessary changes
Uses simpler language to convey the same meaning, replacing both words with more common terms.
Inappropriate amendments
Replaces "revisions" with "amendments" and "unwarranted" with "inappropriate", suggesting that the changes are not suitable or fitting.
Undesirable adaptations
Replaces "revisions" with "adaptations" and "unwarranted" with "undesirable", implying the changes are unwelcome or unfavorable.
Gratuitous edits
Substitutes "revisions" with "edits" and "unwarranted" with "gratuitous", suggesting that the changes are excessive and uncalled for.
Unjustified corrections
Replaces "revisions" with "corrections" and "unwarranted" with "unjustified", implying the changes are not properly supported or validated.
Pointless adjustments
Substitutes "revisions" with "adjustments" and "unwarranted" with "pointless", highlighting the lack of purpose or value in the changes.
Superfluous modifications
Replaces "revisions" with "modifications" and "unwarranted" with "superfluous", indicating that the changes are beyond what is necessary or sufficient.
Uncalled-for alterations
Uses a more informal tone, replacing "unwarranted" with "uncalled-for", emphasizing the changes were not requested or required.
FAQs
How to use "unwarranted revisions" in a sentence?
You can use "unwarranted revisions" to describe changes that are unnecessary or unjustified, such as, "The editor made several "unwarranted revisions" to the original manuscript, altering the author's intended message."
What can I say instead of "unwarranted revisions"?
You can use alternatives like "unjustified alterations", "needless modifications", or "unnecessary changes" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "unwarranted revisions" or "unnecessary revisions"?
Both ""unwarranted revisions"" and "unnecessary revisions" are grammatically correct. "Unwarranted" implies the revisions lack justification, while "unnecessary" suggests they are not needed. The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
What's the difference between "unwarranted revisions" and "unjustified revisions"?
"Unwarranted revisions" suggests the changes are not deserved or appropriate, while "unjustified revisions" implies they lack a valid reason or basis. They are very similar, but "unjustified" focuses more on the absence of a rational explanation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested