under check

USAGE SUMMARY

"under check" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation where something is being monitored or kept in check. For example, "Safety protocols are under check at the factory."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

HUNGRY GIRL 300 UNDER 300, by Lisa Lillien.

The New York Times

No under-18s.

Independent

Adults £5; under-16s free.

Independent

England Under-19s, England Under-21s.

The Guardian - Sport

Under-23 men Owain Doull, Scott Davies, Tao Geoghegen Hart, Alex Peters, Gabriel Cullaigh.

The Guardian - Sport

Admission £3.50 (free to under-16s).

The Guardian - Travel

Under-13s and over-70s go free.

Independent

Glover was at 15-under 131.

The New York Times - Sports

He finished at 14-under 266.

The New York Times - Sports

He was at 13-under 131.

The New York Times - Sports

She finished with a 17-under 271.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use the phrase "under check" to emphasize ongoing monitoring or observation of a process or activity.

Common error

Avoid using "under check" when referring to a one-time action. This phrase implies continuous monitoring, not a singular event.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "under check" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, typically modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate a state of being monitored, controlled, or verified. Ludwig AI confirms this usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "under check" is grammatically sound and serves to indicate that something is being actively monitored or controlled. Ludwig AI supports its correct usage in describing ongoing observation and restraint. Though currently showing a low frequency of examples, it's deemed suitable for a variety of professional or technical contexts where a proactive approach to maintaining control is relevant. Alternative phrases such as "being monitored" or "held in check" can offer subtle variations in emphasis, depending on the specific nuance desired. Overall, while examples are missing, the phrase is validated as correct and usable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

held in check

A more common idiom indicating something is being restrained.

kept in control

Suggests a continuous effort to maintain order.

being controlled

Emphasizes the act of maintaining power and direction.

being monitored

Focuses on the act of continuous observation for control.

being supervised

Highlights the oversight aspect of a process or activity.

held in restraint

Implies a deliberate effort to limit or suppress something.

under surveillance

Focuses on close observation, often for security purposes.

subject to verification

Shifts focus to the process of confirming accuracy.

being regulated

Highlights the governance aspect of maintaining control.

subject to scrutiny

Emphasizes rigorous examination and critical assessment.

FAQs

How can I use "under check" in a sentence?

You can use "under check" to describe a situation where something is being monitored or kept under control. For example, "Safety protocols are "under check" at the factory".

What phrases are similar to "under check"?

Similar phrases include "being monitored", "being controlled", or "held in check", each carrying slightly different nuances.

Is "under check" grammatically correct?

Yes, "under check" is grammatically correct and usable in written English. It indicates that something is being monitored or restrained.

What's the difference between "under check" and "in check"?

"Under check" suggests a process of monitoring, while "in check" implies a state of being currently restrained or controlled. The subtle difference lies in the active vs. static nature of the control.