twice as weak

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "twice as weak" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare the strength or effectiveness of something, indicating that it is half as strong as another reference point. Example: "The new material is twice as weak as the previous version, making it unsuitable for our needs."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

It should be mentioned that assumption (35), which, by Theorem 2, ensures the applicability of the iteration scheme based on formulae (19), (20), is twice as weak as assumption (11) for the original sequence (4).

Boundary Value Problems

We note that the smallness assumption (6.4), which guarantees the convergence of iterations in Corollary 6.7, is twice as weak as the corresponding condition (3.5) of Proposition 3.1: r ( K ) < 1 T ϱ ∗. (6.29).

Boundary Value Problems

It should be noted that the convergence of the iteration scheme in Corollary 13.1 is guaranteed under the assumption r ( K ) < 20 ( 3 T ) − 1, which is twice as weak as the corresponding condition of Corollary 13.2 ( r ( K ) < 10 ( 3 T ) − 1 ).

Boundary Value Problems

In contrast to the unmodified scheme of periodic successive approximations (Proposition 3.1, r ( K ) < T − 1 ϱ ∗ − 1 ), here the iterations are proved to be convergent under the assumption that is twice as weak as in the former case (Theorem 6.5, r ( K ) < 2 T − 1 ϱ ∗ − 1 ).

Boundary Value Problems

The value of nucleotide diversity, twice as weak in the east (clade C) as in the west (clade B) north African mtDNA lineages, together with unresolved relationships between eastern populations, is rather consistent with southward dispersal either via Tyrrhenian/Aegean routes or the Strait of Gibraltar (model 2, Fig 2) [ 15].

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

Despite the city's weak economy, almost twice as many restaurants opened in the past year as closed, according to the 2003 Zagat New York City Restaurant Survey published today.

The New York Times

In Arabidopsis, knockout mutants exhibit no secondary cell wall development in xylem fibers, are shorter, bushier and have twice as many stems and stems are weaker [ 71].

BMC Genomics

International trade increased last quarter, and exports grew nearly twice as fast as imports, aided by a relatively weak dollar.

The New York Times

Suicide rates are nearly twice as high in parts of the country with weak gun laws and higher rates of gun ownership.

The New York Times

Often less sure of themselves (and frequently working with weaker material), aspiring monologists sometimes work twice as hard to nail certain dramatic moments instead of letting their words sail out into the audience on their own.

Huffington Post

Weak patients with PdiTw <10 cmH2O required more than twice as long to wean from mechanical ventilation than stronger patients with PdiTw levels ≥10 cmH2O.

Critical Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing the strength of two items, ensure the context is clear to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what the item is "twice as weak" as.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "twice as weak" is equivalent to 'half the strength' in all contexts. While numerically related, the perception can vary, so choose the phrasing that best conveys the intended meaning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "twice as weak" functions as an adjectival phrase used for comparative description. It modifies a noun by indicating the degree to which it possesses the quality of being weak, in relation to another entity or standard. Ludwig AI confirms its usage in varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "twice as weak" is a grammatically correct and understandable way to express that something has half the strength of something else. Ludwig AI analysis shows the phrase used effectively in various contexts. While it isn't especially frequent, it's a precise comparative adjective that's most at home in science and media writing, as well as analytical or comparative discussions. It's important to use the phrase carefully, ensuring that what is being compared is clear, to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

half as strong

Expresses the same idea of reduced strength but uses a different numerical comparison.

significantly weaker

Indicates a notable reduction in strength without specifying a precise factor.

considerably feebler

Implies a substantial degree of weakness or ineffectiveness.

much less potent

Focuses on the reduced effectiveness or power of something.

markedly reduced

Highlights a clear and distinct decrease in strength or capability.

substantially impaired

Suggests a significant decline in functionality or strength.

noticeably diminished

Emphasizes that the weakness is easily observed or apparent.

appreciably softer

Refers to a tangible reduction in intensity, force, or impact.

relatively fragile

Indicates a tendency to break or fail easily compared to something else.

somewhat compromised

Suggests that the strength or integrity has been negatively affected.

FAQs

How can I use "twice as weak" in a sentence?

Use "twice as weak" to directly compare the feebleness of one thing to another. For example, "The new rope is "twice as weak" as the old one, so we need to be more careful."

What's a synonym for "twice as weak"?

Alternatives to "twice as weak" include "half as strong", "significantly weaker", or "considerably feebler". Choose the synonym that best fits the tone and context of your writing.

Is it more accurate to say "twice as weak" or "half as strong"?

Both "twice as weak" and "half as strong" describe the same relative relationship, but "half as strong" may be more direct and easier to understand in certain contexts. The choice depends on the emphasis you want to convey.

In what situations would "twice as weak" be inappropriate?

Avoid using "twice as weak" in highly formal or technical contexts where precise measurements are needed. In such situations, using specific numerical values or more objective descriptions might be more appropriate.