true for all

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "true for all" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to express that a statement or condition applies universally or without exception. Example: "The principle of equality is true for all individuals, regardless of their background."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"That has been true for all time.

The New Yorker

"That's true for all teams.

The Guardian - Sport

This holds true for all disciplines.

Harvard University

"But that's true for all of us.

The New York Times - Sports

That's true for all art criticism.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

That's not true for all of us.

The New York Times - Books

This isn't true for all pets.

The New York Times - Travel

It's true for all of us.

The New York Times - Magazine

This holds true for all developed countries.

Harvard Business Review

This presumably holds true for all amorphous brittle ceramic materials.

Acta Materialia

I wonder if this is equally true for all generations?

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "true for all", ensure the statement you are making is genuinely universally applicable and doesn't have hidden exceptions. Overstating a claim can weaken your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "true for all" when the statement only applies to a specific context or a majority of cases. Qualify your statement with phrases like "often", "generally", or "in most cases" if the claim is not universally valid.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "true for all" functions as a qualifier or descriptor indicating that a statement or condition applies universally, without exceptions. As confirmed by Ludwig, it asserts the unconditional validity of a principle or rule across all instances.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

32%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "true for all" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to assert universal applicability. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread use across diverse fields, including science, news, and academia. While powerful, it's crucial to ensure the statement it modifies genuinely holds without exception to avoid overgeneralization. Related phrases like "universally valid" or "always holds true" can offer nuanced alternatives. Use "true for all" judiciously to strengthen your claims, but always verify its accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Always holds true

Adds emphasis on the consistent validity over time or instances.

True in all instances

More formal, emphasizing the truth across individual occurrences.

Without exception

Explicitly states the absence of any exceptions to the rule or statement.

Valid in every case

Emphasizes the validity aspect across all instances.

Universally valid

Combines the concepts of universality and validity.

Applies universally

Focuses on the concept of universal application rather than truth.

Invariably the case

Highlights the lack of variation or exception.

True without fail

Emphasizes the reliability and certainty of the truth.

True across the board

Idiomatic expression conveying complete truthfulness or applicability.

Applicable to everyone

Shifts focus to the target group that the statement is true for.

FAQs

How can I use "true for all" in a sentence?

You can use "true for all" to indicate that a statement or principle applies universally, such as: "This rule is "true for all" students, regardless of their background."

What are some alternatives to saying "true for all"?

Alternatives include "universally valid", "valid in every case", or "always holds true". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to use "true for all"?

No, it's important to ensure the statement is genuinely universally applicable. If there are exceptions, use qualifiers like "generally", "in most cases", or "often" instead.

What's the difference between "true for all" and "true in most cases"?

"True for all" indicates a universal truth without exceptions, while "true in most cases" acknowledges that there may be instances where the statement does not apply. The choice depends on the accuracy of the statement in relation to the situation.