true errors of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "true errors of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing genuine mistakes or inaccuracies in a particular context, such as data analysis or research findings. Example: "The study revealed the true errors of the previous calculations, leading to a reevaluation of the results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

We compare the true errors of designed classifiers under the typical i.i.d.i.d

Pattern Recognition

In conjunction with the knowledge of the quadratic convergence rate of the frequencies of free vibration, we can estimate that the true errors of the 360 µm model were estimated at <3.3% [40].

Plosone

Reassessment of errors by the study team resulted in exclusion of a total of 143 errors which were not considered true errors of the process of prescribing.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

These performance metrics include the first, second, and cross moments of the Bayesian MMSE error estimator with the true error of LDA, and therefore, the root-mean-square (RMS) error of the estimator.

Pattern Recognition

The feature-label distribution is known and this allows us to exactly compute the true error of the designed classifier, which is then used to derive the empirical deviation distribution for the different estimators.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Figure 2 shows results with a true error of 10−4 miscalls per base.

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Sponsored by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, it takes advantage of the ongoing testing conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) to estimate the true error of models that have been applied to make prospective predictions on previously untested, noncongeneric-chemical substances.

Environmental Health Perspectives

It also provides background about the origin and goals of the PTE project, outlines the special challenge associated with estimating the true error of models that aspire to predict open-system behavior, and summarizes what has been learned to date.

Environmental Health Perspectives

This paper provides exact analytical expressions for the first and second moments of the true error for linear discriminant analysis (LDA) when the data are univariate and taken from two stochastic Gaussian processes.

Pattern Recognition

We derive approximate expressions for the first and second moments of the true error rate of the proposed classifier under the assumption of two widely used models for the uncertainty classes: ε-contamination and p-point classes.

Pattern Recognition

Therefore, the errors between parentally reported and measured weight and height in this sample may be underestimates of the true errors, since almost 30% of the parents refused to complete the questionnaire.

BMC Pediatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing data analysis or research, use "true errors of" to emphasize the presence of genuine inaccuracies that affect the validity of the findings.

Common error

Avoid using "true errors of" in casual conversation or informal writing. This phrase is more appropriate for formal, technical, or scientific contexts where precision and accuracy are crucial.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "true errors of" serves as a descriptor, highlighting genuine inaccuracies or mistakes within a given system, process, or set of data. It is used to emphasize the authenticity and impact of these errors, as supported by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "true errors of" is grammatically correct but rare, primarily appearing in scientific contexts. According to Ludwig, it emphasizes genuine inaccuracies, differentiating them from perceived mistakes. It is best suited for formal and technical writing where accuracy is paramount. When seeking alternatives, consider "actual mistakes in" or "genuine inaccuracies in" to convey a similar meaning. Overall, while usable, its formal tone restricts its use to specific contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

actual mistakes in

Replaces "errors" with "mistakes" and "true" with "actual", emphasizing the reality of the errors.

genuine inaccuracies in

Substitutes "errors" with "inaccuracies" and "true" with "genuine", highlighting the lack of precision.

real flaws in

Uses "flaws" instead of "errors" and "real" instead of "true", shifting the focus to inherent defects.

legitimate errors within

Replaces "true" with "legitimate", indicating that the errors are valid and justifiable under certain conditions.

valid mistakes in

Uses "valid" to denote the errors are well-founded and authentic.

precise inaccuracies of

Shifts the focus to the exactness of the inaccuracies, rather than simply their existence.

correct mistakes of

Emphasizes the need to rectify the mistakes of something.

verified errors of

Highlights that the errors have been confirmed or validated.

substantiated inaccuracies of

Indicates that there is evidence to support the inaccuracies.

factual errors in

Focuses specifically on errors related to facts or data.

FAQs

How can I use "true errors of" in a sentence?

You can use "true errors of" to emphasize genuine inaccuracies in a specific context, such as in data analysis or research findings. For example: "The study revealed the true errors of the previous calculations."

What are some alternatives to "true errors of"?

Some alternatives include "actual mistakes in", "genuine inaccuracies in", or "real flaws in", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

In what contexts is it best to use "true errors of"?

"True errors of" is best used in formal, technical, or scientific contexts where precision and accuracy are paramount. It is less suitable for casual conversation or informal writing.

What's the difference between "true errors of" and "reported errors of"?

"True errors of" refers to the actual, genuine mistakes, whereas "reported errors of" refers to the errors that have been identified and documented, which may not represent the complete picture. The "true errors of" may be greater than what is reported.