true discrepancies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "true discrepancies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing genuine differences or inconsistencies in data, information, or observations. Example: "The audit revealed true discrepancies in the financial records that needed to be addressed immediately."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

We performed a manual review of discrepant calls and ultimately determined that nine high-quality SNV calls were true discrepancies, corresponding to eight NGS false positives and one NGS false negative (Table 1, see Supplementary Note 1 online).

Genetics in Medicine

Judging from the results of the meta-analysis, true discrepancies are relatively rare, but may be significant, up to ±11.4 mmHg.

Critical Care

However, we were not able to confirm a selected subset of those SNPs and further validation is needed to establish any true discrepancies between the genomic DNA and the cell line.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Such a value is very close to the true discrepancy, (E_{1}).

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

The true discrepancy (E:= int_{0}^{1}varphi(f(x)),dx-varphi (int_{0}^{1}f(x),dx )) between the two sides of the Jensen inequality is (Eapprox0.3612).

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

It is advisable to have the shoe height a little less than the true discrepancy during lengthening; it increases the 'lifespan' of the shoe and reduces the number of alterations needed (Fig. 12).

Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction

Thus, whether or not there is a true discrepancy remains to be resolved.

eLife

The lower percentage of Hispanic cases could reflect a true discrepancy; recent studies have suggested that the true rate of ALS in the Hispanic population is lower than in the non-Hispanic population.

BMJ Open

However, their inclusion of individuals subsequently born pre-term, those exposed to maternal smoking during pregnancy, and those with known growth restricting pathologies would have deflated the true discrepancy.

BMC Pediatrics

This is especially true when discrepancies appear in the various indices of asthma control in the clinic.

BMJ Open

Only nonredundant nonalignments were stored and exported, as examining redundant nonalignments to assess whether there are true semantic discrepancies entails additional, unnecessary effort and biases statistics.

Bioinformatics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "true discrepancies", ensure the context clearly establishes that these are not merely apparent or superficial differences, but fundamental inconsistencies requiring attention.

Common error

Avoid using "true discrepancies" to describe negligible differences or expected variations. Reserve the phrase for significant inconsistencies that impact understanding or outcomes.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "true discrepancies" functions as a noun phrase, where 'true' modifies 'discrepancies' to emphasize that these are genuine and significant inconsistencies. As Ludwig AI explains, this is found in contexts where accuracy is critical.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "true discrepancies" is a grammatically correct phrase used to denote genuine and significant inconsistencies, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It's most frequently found in scientific and news contexts, indicating its suitability for formal and technical discussions. When writing, use "true discrepancies" to highlight inconsistencies that are not superficial, but carry weight and impact analysis. Remember to consider alternative phrases like "actual inconsistencies" or "genuine differences" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

actual inconsistencies

Emphasizes the reality and existence of the inconsistencies.

genuine differences

Highlights the authenticity and lack of artificiality in the differences.

real disparities

Focuses on the tangible and concrete nature of the differences.

verifiable inconsistencies

Stresses that the inconsistencies can be confirmed or proven.

substantive disagreements

Indicates that the disagreements are significant and meaningful.

authentic variations

Highlights that the variations are original and not imitation.

confirmed contradictions

Implies that the contradictions have been verified to be true.

factual inaccuracies

Shifts the focus to errors in factual information.

legitimate divergences

Highlights the validity and justification of the divergences.

validated conflicts

Suggests that the conflicts have been confirmed through validation.

FAQs

How can I use "true discrepancies" in a sentence?

You can use "true discrepancies" to highlight significant inconsistencies found in data, reports, or observations. For example: "The audit revealed "true discrepancies" in the financial records that needed immediate investigation."

What are some alternatives to saying "true discrepancies"?

Alternatives include "actual inconsistencies", "genuine differences", or "real disparities", depending on the specific context.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "true discrepancies"?

It is appropriate to use "true discrepancies" in formal settings like academic papers, scientific reports, and business analyses where precise language is important. More informal contexts might benefit from simpler terms.

What distinguishes "true discrepancies" from simple errors?

"True discrepancies" suggests a fundamental inconsistency that might stem from methodological problems, data manipulation, or other systematic issues, whereas simple errors are typically isolated and easily corrected. The phrase conveys a sense of importance and the need for deeper investigation.