trained with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "trained with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to describe someone who has been trained in a particular skill or activity, usually under the tutelage of an expert or mentor, e.g. "He was trained with a martial arts master."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He trained with a Russian figure skater.

The New York Times - Sports

I trained with him," he says.

The New York Times - Food

He also trained with weights.

The New York Times - Sports

I never trained with Marion Jones.

The Guardian - Sport

"I've trained with her for four years".

The New York Times

"We have trained with them for this.

The New York Times

She herself trained with Dr. Blackburn.

The New York Times - Science

She even trained with George Balanchine.

The New York Times

It doesn't mean I've trained with him".

The Guardian - Sport

Trained with after bout so not bigoted.

The Guardian

I trained with them since January.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "trained with", ensure clarity about the specific skill or knowledge gained. Providing context enhances understanding and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "trained with" without specifying the area of training or the person/entity providing the training. For instance, instead of saying "He trained with the team", specify "He trained with the team in advanced driving techniques".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "trained with" functions as a verb phrase indicating that someone has received instruction or practice alongside another person, group, or using a specific method. As Ludwig AI shows, it connects the trainee to the context of their learning.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Encyclopedias

4%

Social Media

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "trained with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It describes the act of receiving instruction or practice alongside someone or something. Its register is generally neutral, making it suitable for diverse contexts ranging from news reports to personal narratives. As Ludwig shows, to enhance clarity, always specify the area of training or the person/entity providing the training. Its prevalence across authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian underscores its widespread acceptance and proper usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received training alongside

Emphasizes simultaneous training with others, suggesting a shared learning environment.

undertook instruction with

Formal alternative emphasizing a structured learning process with a specific instructor or method.

learned in collaboration with

Emphasizes teamwork and knowledge sharing during the learning process.

apprenticed under

Implies a longer-term, more hands-on learning experience with a mentor.

studied in cooperation with

Highlights a collaborative learning environment with shared goals.

participated in workshops alongside

Refers to specific, often short-term, training events with co-participants.

mentored by

Highlights the guiding role of a more experienced person in the learning process.

coached by

Suggests a more directive and targeted form of training, often in a sport or specific skill.

gained expertise through exposure to

Suggests learning by being around something or someone, absorbing knowledge passively.

developed skills in tandem with

Focuses on the parallel development of skills alongside something else.

FAQs

How can I use "trained with" in a sentence?

You can use "trained with" to indicate that someone received training or instruction from a particular person, group, or method. For example, "She "trained with" a renowned chef" or "The soldiers "trained with" the latest military equipment".

What are some alternatives to "trained with"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "received training from", "was instructed by", or "studied under".

Is it correct to say "I trained with" or "I was trained with"?

The phrase "I "trained with"" is generally correct when indicating who or what you trained alongside. "I was trained with" is less common and might be rephrased for clarity, such as "I was trained using" or "I was trained by".

What is the difference between "trained with" and "trained by"?

"Trained with" typically implies that you underwent training alongside someone or used a specific method or tool. "Trained by" indicates that someone specifically provided the training or instruction. For example, "I "trained with" a new software program" versus "I was "trained by" a certified instructor".