trained to

USAGE SUMMARY

"trained to" is a correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It is often used to describe someone who has received instruction or education in a particular skill or activity. Here is an example sentence: Sarah was trained to handle emergency situations and was able to calmly administer first aid when her coworker fainted.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

I'm only trained to defend Lebanon".

The New York Times

I had been trained to believe that.

The New Yorker

Musicians are not trained to operate artillery.

Independent

"I'm not trained to do this.

The New York Times

You are so trained to admire them.

The New Yorker

"We're not trained to be counselors.

The New York Times

They must be trained to do that".

The New York Times

He was trained to think like that.

The New York Times

Nurses are trained to think more holistically.

The New York Times

Who's trained to use this equipment?

The New York Times

The lion was occasionally trained to hunt.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "trained to" when you want to emphasize the process of acquiring skills or knowledge for a specific purpose. For example, "The dog was trained to detect explosives."

Common error

Avoid using "trained to" when referring to innate abilities or natural inclinations. It is more appropriate to say someone is "inclined to" or "talented in" something rather than "trained to" if formal training was not involved.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "trained to" functions as a verb phrase indicating a state of being prepared or qualified to perform a specific action or task. Ludwig AI identifies numerous examples showcasing its use in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "trained to" is a very common and grammatically sound way to express that someone has received specific instruction or education to perform a task. Ludwig AI validates this, confirming its frequent appearance in diverse contexts such as news media, science, and encyclopedias. While alternatives like "qualified to" or "prepared to" exist, "trained to" specifically emphasizes the training process itself. Remember to use it when highlighting formally acquired skills, and avoid it when describing innate abilities.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

competent to

Implies having the necessary skills and knowledge to adequately perform a task or fulfill a responsibility.

qualified to

Focuses on meeting the necessary standards or requirements to perform a specific task or role.

prepared to

Emphasizes readiness and anticipation of a future action, suggesting a mental or logistical state of being ready.

equipped to

Highlights the provision of necessary tools, knowledge, or skills to effectively handle a situation or task.

educated to

Emphasizes the formal learning process that has imparted the knowledge and skills necessary for a particular role.

skilled in

Places emphasis on having developed expertise and proficiency through practice or learning.

adept at

Suggests a natural talent or quickness in learning and executing a particular task.

coached to

Suggests personalized guidance and support aimed at improving performance or skills in a specific area.

capable of

Indicates the inherent ability or potential to perform a specific task or action.

instructed to

Focuses on having received direct orders or guidance on how to perform a specific task.

FAQs

How can I use "trained to" in a sentence?

You can use "trained to" to describe someone who has received specific instruction or education. For instance, "Firefighters are trained to handle emergency situations."

What are some alternatives to "trained to"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "qualified to", "prepared to", or "equipped to". The best choice depends on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "I am training to be" instead of "I am trained to be"?

Both are grammatically correct, but they have different meanings. "I am training to be" implies you are currently undergoing training, while "I am trained to be" means you have completed the training and possess the necessary skills.

What is the difference between "skilled at" and "trained to"?

"Skilled at" refers to a general proficiency or talent in a particular area. "Trained to", on the other hand, emphasizes the formal instruction or preparation received for a specific task or role. For example, someone can be "skilled at" painting, but trained to be a surgeon.