totally of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "totally of" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not a standard expression and may confuse readers due to its awkward construction. Example: "The project is totally of great importance" does not make sense.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

But Ms. Lam, 28, is totally of her moment.

The New York Times

"He seems to have escaped somehow from the 1960s but is totally of his time".

The New York Times

But yesterday, Dr. Koplan (pronounced COPE-lun) said: "I resigned totally of my own volition.

The New York Times - Health

Its distinctive feature is to be found in the destruction, either partly or totally, of the victim.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In another part, dancers and nondancers were doing 'Trio A.' It was unpretentious, accessible, egalitarian and totally of the moment.

The New York Times - Arts

"Like the movies of Miyazaki, she feels totally of the moment, but she's reacting to something that feels ancient and archetypal," Mueller said.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

This was totally out of the rules of discourse.

Archives of Sexual Behavior

"Those kind of achievements seemed totally out of reach".

Independent

It was totally out of the blue.

The New York Times

It's totally out of control".

The New York Times

The system was totally out of control".

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "totally of" in formal writing. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives such as "completely made of" or "entirely composed of" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

Do not use "totally of" to describe what something is made of. Instead, use phrases like "completely made of", "entirely composed of", or "wholly consisting of". For example, instead of "The statue was totally of marble", write "The statue was completely made of marble".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "totally of" functions incorrectly as a prepositional phrase, often intended to describe composition or origin. As Ludwig AI explains, it is not a standard expression. Sentences using it often violate standard grammatical rules.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "totally of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As indicated by Ludwig AI, this is not a standard expression. While it appears in various sources, including News & Media, Encyclopedias, and Science, it's recommended to use grammatically correct alternatives such as "completely made of", "entirely composed of", or "wholly consisting of" to ensure clarity and precision. These alternatives effectively convey the intended meaning of complete composition or origin.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

completely made of

Focuses on the composition or material aspect, indicating full constitution from something.

entirely composed of

Emphasizes the complete constitution of something from specified elements or materials.

wholly consisting of

Highlights the exclusive and complete composition of something.

fully derived from

Indicates complete origin or source from something else.

altogether from

Highlights complete origin or source with slight difference in register.

absolutely from

Focuses on complete origin but with a more emphatic tone.

utterly from

Similar to 'absolutely from' but sounds more formal.

perfectly from

Expresses source with nuance of quality.

entirely about

Expresses subject.

completely about

Expresses subject.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "totally of"?

Alternatives include phrases like "completely made of", "entirely composed of", or "wholly consisting of", depending on the intended meaning and context. Using these alternatives ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.

Is "totally of" grammatically correct?

No, "totally of" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "completely made of" or "entirely composed of".

How can I use "completely made of" instead of "totally of"?

Use "completely made of" to describe the composition of something. For example, instead of "The house was totally of wood", you would say "The house was "completely made of" wood".

What's the difference between "totally of" and "entirely composed of"?

"Totally of" is grammatically incorrect, while "entirely composed of" is a correct and formal way to describe the composition of something. For instance, "The team was entirely composed of volunteers" is a proper usage.