Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
total employees
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "total employees" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the complete number of employees within a company or organization. Example: "The total employees in our company have increased significantly over the past year."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
57 human-written examples
Greenbrier has 4,500 total employees.
News & Media
About 3,000 of WPP's 140,000 total employees work for Global Team Ford.
News & Media
The 263 total employees on leave during that time had salaries of more than $31 million.
News & Media
The Verizon strikers represent a little more than a fifth of the company's total employees, and a relatively privileged fifth.
News & Media
Of the casino's 10,000 total employees, Mr. Bogle estimated that 600 to 800 workers are of Asian descent.
News & Media
Total employees have criticized the company's decision to scale back refining in Europe while expanding it in the Middle East.
News & Media
For FTSE and other listed companies, the recent Strategic Report regulation requires disclosure of gender diversity information for the board, management and total employees.
News & Media
The risks are so pervasive that Total employees can't travel around town without an escort and are not allowed to leave Sana, the Yemeni capital, on their own.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
3 human-written examples
In 2014, 47 employees had total employee benefits (excluding employer pension costs) of more than £60,000 per annum, with the highest earner receiving £210,001 – £220,000 (total employee benefits).
News & Media
One Total employee was on board while the remainder worked for contract companies, including the deceased.
News & Media
Total employee compensation — wages plus benefits — has fared a little better.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use “total employees” in formal reports and business communications to maintain a professional tone.
Common error
Avoid the common mistake of assuming “total employees” refers only to full-time staff. Always clarify if the number includes part-time, temporary, or contract workers to prevent misrepresentation.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "total employees" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject, object, or complement in a sentence. As shown in the examples from Ludwig, it refers to the aggregate number of workers within an organization.
Frequent in
News & Media
48%
Science
27%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "total employees" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to denote the overall count of workers in an organization. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage across various contexts, including news, science, and business. When using the phrase, clarity is key; specify whether part-time, temporary, or contract workers are included. For alternative expressions, consider "total workforce" or "overall staff count", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. Given its prevalence and straightforward meaning, "total employees" remains a reliable choice for reporting workforce statistics.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
total workforce
Focuses on the entire group of people actively engaged in work for an organization.
overall staff count
Highlights the numerical aspect of the staff, emphasizing a headcount.
entire personnel
Emphasizes all individuals employed, often used in formal contexts.
complete employee roster
Refers to the official list of all employees.
full complement of staff
Suggests the required or ideal number of staff members is present.
aggregate number of employees
Stresses the combined or sum total of all employees.
total number of personnel
A more formal alternative, emphasizing the human resources aspect.
workforce size
Highlights the magnitude of the working population in an organization.
staffing level
Indicates the quantity of employees available for work.
headcount
A simple count of the number of employees, often used internally.
FAQs
How can I use "total employees" in a sentence?
Use "total employees" to refer to the entire count of workers in an organization, like: "The company's report indicated that its "total employees" numbered over 5,000 worldwide."
What's an alternative to saying "total employees"?
Alternatives include "total workforce", "overall staff count", or "entire personnel", depending on the context and desired level of formality.
Does "total employees" include part-time workers?
The term "total employees" generally includes both full-time and part-time workers, unless otherwise specified. Always clarify if you're referring only to full-time staff.
Is it accurate to use "total employees" when referring to contractors?
While "total employees" typically refers to individuals directly employed by a company, it can include contractors if the context implies a broader count of all workers. For clarity, specify "total workforce" or "total number of workers" when including contractors.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested