to validate against

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to validate against" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts involving checking or confirming data or information against a set standard or criteria. Example: "The software is designed to validate against the latest security protocols to ensure data integrity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Attempts to validate against a physiological measure have been called validation against a "gold standard" (Swift et al. 2010).

Alcohol research : current reviews

However, no consensus yet exists in an international guideline regarding which assessment tool to use, and validation itself is problematic because of the lack of a standard to validate against that is not based on opinion.

Critical Care

A comprehensive kinetic model for MB and MC combustion was developed, and applied to validate against the new experimental data.

Combustion and Flame

Secondly, an optimization example of NASA Stage 35 was conducted to validate against the summarized flow mechanisms.

Energy

We attempt to validate against experimental data using two forms of the phase-field model developed recently to represent the concentration of Li+ in nano-sized LiFePO4 crystals.

Electrochimica Acta

3D finite element analysis (FEA) is carried out in parallel to validate against results obtained from analytical and exact numerical models.

Composites Part B: Engineering

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Models were found to validate well against individuals in PLCO who would have been eligible for the NLST.

Stanford University

We sought to validate ultrasound against other established methods of confirming laryngeal mask airway (LMA) placement.

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Three flow regimes were tested to validate results against published data and to investigate the possibility of reducing the number of key variables.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

The algorithm examined extreme cases of vertical and horizontal curvatures in order to validate them against available 2D models.

European Transport Research Review

The purpose of the present study was to develop such an active contour method and to validate it against results obtained from manual positioning of regions of interest.

EJNMMI Physics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "to validate against" in contexts where you are formally comparing data, models, or results to a known standard or baseline for verification purposes. This often occurs in scientific, technical, and academic writing.

Common error

Avoid using "to validate against" without explicitly stating what you are validating against. For instance, saying 'The results were validated' is vague. Instead, specify 'The results were validated against the industry standard'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to validate against" functions as a purpose connector, often found in scientific and technical contexts. It describes the action of checking or confirming something's accuracy by comparing it to a known standard or set of data. As Ludwig AI points out, it’s a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

15%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "to validate against" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, according to Ludwig AI, primarily used in scientific, technical, and academic contexts. It serves to indicate a process of checking or confirming data, models, or results against a defined standard or benchmark. The frequency of this phrase is uncommon, with its most frequent use found in science and research publications. When using "to validate against", it's crucial to clearly state the specific standard or data being used for validation to maintain clarity and precision. Alternatives such as "to verify with" or "to check against" can be used depending on the nuance you want to convey, ensuring they fit the context appropriately.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to verify with

Emphasizes checking accuracy using a specific source.

to check against

Suggests a comparison for accuracy or consistency.

to confirm with

Focuses on ensuring something is true or correct using a standard.

to test against

Implies a more rigorous assessment, often in a scientific context.

to benchmark against

Highlights comparison against a standard for performance evaluation.

to measure against

Indicates evaluating something relative to a specific criterion.

to corroborate with

Focuses on strengthening evidence through comparison with other sources.

to align with

Emphasizes the degree to which something matches or agrees with a standard.

to compare against

A general term for assessing similarities and differences with a set standard.

to cross-reference with

Focuses on checking information across multiple sources to ensure accuracy.

FAQs

How can I use "to validate against" in a sentence?

You can use "to validate against" when you're comparing data, results, or models to a known standard or established criteria. For example, "The new algorithm was used "to validate against" existing benchmarks."

What does "to validate against" mean?

"To validate against" means to check or prove the accuracy of something by comparing it with another set of data, standard, or criteria that is already considered true or reliable.

What are some alternatives to "to validate against"?

Some alternatives to "to validate against" include "to verify with", "to check against", or "to confirm with depending" on the specific context.

In what types of writing is it appropriate to use "to validate against"?

The phrase "to validate against" is appropriate in technical, scientific, and academic writing, where it's important to show that data or models have been rigorously checked against established standards or data sets.