to validate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to validate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the act of confirming or verifying the accuracy or legitimacy of something. Example: "Before we proceed with the project, we need to validate the data to ensure its reliability."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There's little evidence to validate this.

The New York Times

If governments need leaks to validate their secrecy, leakers need secrecy to validate their leaks.

The New Yorker

ARG was performed to validate PET results.

Nature

The new model is easier to validate.

Harvard Business Review

The media establishment reports on itself to validate its influence.

The New York Times - Style

You will receive an email to validate your email address.

The Guardian

Then constantly ask your employees to validate you.

The Guardian

Pierce's United States team nomination seems to validate his maturity.

The New York Times

I'm not looking for anyone to validate that for me.

The New York Times

"But she still has the power to validate a trend".

The New York Times

Those who support him found much to validate their support.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "to validate", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being validated and the criteria for validation. Providing specific details enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

While "to validate" is grammatically correct, overuse in informal conversation can sound stilted. Opt for simpler alternatives like "to check" or "to confirm" in casual settings to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to validate" functions as an infinitive, often used to express the purpose or intention behind an action. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage aligns with standard grammar rules and is frequently seen across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Reference

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to validate" serves as an infinitive expressing the intent to confirm or verify something. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and frequently used across diverse fields such as news, science, and business. Its register varies from neutral to professional. While generally appropriate, consider simpler alternatives like "to check" or "to confirm" in informal contexts to avoid sounding overly formal. Remember to specify what is being validated to maintain clarity. The phrase is very common and authoritative sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and Forbes frequently use it.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to verify

Focuses more on confirming the truth or accuracy of something, often through investigation or evidence.

to confirm

Implies strengthening or establishing something that is already suspected or believed.

to authenticate

Emphasizes establishing the genuineness or legitimacy of something, particularly documents or signatures.

to corroborate

Involves providing additional evidence to support or strengthen an existing claim or theory.

to substantiate

Focuses on providing evidence to prove the truth or validity of something, often in a formal setting.

to prove

Suggests conclusively demonstrating the truth or correctness of something, leaving no doubt.

to justify

Implies providing a rational basis or acceptable explanation for an action or decision.

to affirm

Emphasizes a strong declaration or confirmation of something, often in a formal or legal context.

to ratify

Specifically refers to formally approving or endorsing something, such as a treaty or agreement.

to certify

Suggests officially attesting to the accuracy or quality of something, often by a recognized authority.

FAQs

How can I use "to validate" in a sentence?

You can use "to validate" to indicate confirming or verifying something. For example: "We need "to validate" the data before drawing conclusions" or "The experiment was conducted "to validate" the hypothesis".

What's a simple alternative to "to validate"?

Depending on the context, you can use simpler alternatives such as "to check", "to confirm", or "to verify".

Is it always necessary to use "to validate", or are there situations where it's redundant?

While "to validate" is useful when emphasizing the confirmation of accuracy or legitimacy, it can be redundant if the context already implies verification. In such cases, consider using a more concise alternative like "to prove" or "to support".

What is the difference between "to validate" and "to invalidate"?

"To validate" means to confirm or prove the accuracy of something, while "to invalidate" means to disprove or nullify something. They are antonyms. For example: "The data "to validate" the hypothesis" versus "The error "to invalidate" the results".