to specify

USAGE SUMMARY

"to specify" is a perfectly valid and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to mean to make something definite or to more precisely describe something. For example, you might say, "We need to specify the terms of the agreement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Why the reluctance to specify?

The New York Times

He refuses to specify any.

The New York Times

He declined to specify.

The New York Times

Make sure to specify one of the….

The New Yorker

But they declined to specify how much.

The New York Times

I do not hesitate to specify.

The New York Times

She declined to specify alternatives.

The New York Times

They declined to specify the fees.

The New York Times

He declined to specify the exact amount.

The New York Times - Arts

Mr. Cordova declined to specify exact prices.

The New York Times

Why the need to specify?

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "to specify", ensure that you provide sufficient detail to avoid ambiguity. Be clear and concise in your descriptions or conditions.

Common error

Avoid unnecessary detail when using "to specify". Too much information can overwhelm your audience and obscure the main point. Focus on the most relevant aspects.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to specify" functions primarily as an infinitive of purpose, often introducing clauses that detail the intentions, requirements, or conditions related to an action or statement. Ludwig examples demonstrate this function, showing it used to introduce explicit details.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Academia

28%

Science

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "to specify" is a versatile phrase used to introduce precise details, conditions, or requirements in a sentence. It is grammatically correct and frequently used across various contexts, as affirmed by Ludwig. Its primary function is to provide clarity and eliminate ambiguity. As shown in Ludwig's examples, this phrase is commonly found in news and media, as well as academic writing. While it is suitable for diverse audiences, it is important to ensure that the level of detail is appropriate to prevent over-specification and to maintain clarity. Alternatives like "to define precisely" or "to lay out the details" can be used depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to define precisely

This alternative is more focused on providing a clear definition, emphasizing exactness.

to lay out the details

This alternative focuses on presenting a complete and thorough description.

to stipulate conditions

This alternative places greater emphasis on setting mandatory requirements.

to designate clearly

This alternative highlights the act of explicitly assigning or indicating something.

to particularize aspects

This alternative emphasizes focusing on specific details and elements.

to detail meticulously

This alternative stresses the importance of giving comprehensive and careful attention to all aspects.

to delineate boundaries

This alternative focuses on clearly marking the limits or scope of something.

to spell out explicitly

This alternative conveys a need for utmost clarity and directness.

to enumerate features

This alternative emphasizes the listing of individual characteristics or qualities.

to concretize intentions

This alternative highlights the act of making intentions tangible and definite.

FAQs

How can I use "to specify" in a sentence?

You can use "to specify" to introduce detailed instructions or requirements, such as "Please be sure "to specify" your preferred delivery date."

What are some alternatives to "to specify"?

Alternatives include "to define precisely", "to lay out the details", or "to stipulate conditions", depending on the context.

Is it always necessary to provide extensive details when using "to specify"?

While "to specify" implies detail, the level of detail should be appropriate for the audience and purpose. Providing only essential information helps avoid confusion and keeps the message focused.

What's the difference between "to specify" and "to suggest"?

"To specify" implies a requirement or a precise detail, whereas "to suggest" offers a recommendation or a possibility. For example, "The contract needs "to specify" the payment terms," versus "I'd like "to suggest" a different approach".