Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

to respond with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to respond with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating the manner or content of a reply to a question, statement, or situation. Example: "When asked about the project, she chose to respond with a detailed explanation of her approach."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

Investors appeared to respond with disappointment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Apple has yet to respond with comment.

News & Media

Independent

This led the government to respond with force-feeding.

News & Media

The Guardian

But we will continue to respond with kindness".

News & Media

The New York Times

The industry has 60 days to respond with proposed modifications.

News & Media

The New York Times

Far better to respond with instincts of one's own.

The guests tend to respond with spontaneity and candor.

News & Media

The New York Times

This is the time to respond with compassion and competence".

News & Media

The New York Times

It's better to respond with support, or to challenge online harassment.

Arsenal's attempts to respond with pressing of their own were, frankly, dismal.

Central European countries appear to respond with folded arms to the plight of their near neighbours.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "to respond with" to clearly indicate the manner or content of a reaction. Ensure the object following "with" specifies the nature of the response, such as "compassion", "force", or "a detailed explanation".

Common error

Avoid using "to respond with" when a simple action or statement is sufficient. Overusing this phrase can make the writing sound unnecessarily complex. Sometimes, a direct verb is more effective: "He answered" instead of "He chose to respond with a statement".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to respond with" functions as an infinitive verb phrase that introduces the manner or content of a reaction. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is often used to describe how someone answers a question, reacts to an event, or addresses a situation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

87%

Science

9%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to respond with" is a versatile expression used to detail the specific manner or content of a response. Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically sound and frequently used, particularly in news and media contexts. When using this phrase, ensure that the object following "with" clearly indicates the nature of the reaction you're describing. While highly common, consider whether a more direct verb might sometimes be more effective to avoid unnecessary complexity. It is crucial to consider the difference between it and alternative phrases like "to react with", which can denote a more instinctive response.

FAQs

How can I use "to respond with" in a sentence?

Use "to respond with" to describe the nature of someone's reaction to a situation. For example, "The company chose "to respond with a formal statement"" or "The community decided "to respond with generosity" after the disaster".

What are some alternatives to "to respond with"?

You can use alternatives like "to reply with", "to answer with", or "to react with", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "to respond with" and "to react with"?

"To respond with" implies a more considered or deliberate action, while "to react with" suggests a more immediate or instinctive action. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize thoughtfulness or spontaneity.

When is it best to use "to respond with" over other similar phrases?

Use "to respond with" when you want to highlight not just the fact of a response, but also the specific manner or content of that response. For instance, "They decided "to respond with patience and understanding"" emphasizes the way they responded.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: