to reduce access

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to reduce access" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing limitations or restrictions on availability or entry to something, such as information, resources, or locations. Example: "The new policy aims to reduce access to sensitive data to protect user privacy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

If health systems are to be organized to reduce access barriers the patients' perspective on the difficulties of accessing care and 'healer shopping' needs to be better understood.

BMC Health Services Research

In statements provided to investigators, they described the enormous pressure they faced to reduce access fees.

The New York Times

"We should take great care in any approach to reduce access to judicial review.

The Guardian

"They are trying to reduce access and trying to make it look bad".

The New York Times

And most likely it can, in some way, in its intent to reduce access and availability.

Cornell University

The emerging health care marketplace, in fact, is likely to reduce access to care for the uninsured.

Princeton University

Telecommunications experts said that in the 1990's, it became common for long-distance providers to seek legal ways to shift telephone traffic to reduce access tariffs.

The New York Times

The bill would also seek to reduce access to abortions, by preventing federal subsidies from going to any health plan that covers abortions.

The New York Times

Facebook works with cellular networks through its Internet.org project to reduce access costs, and it is also developing high-altitude, solar-powered drones designed to deliver wireless Internet.

MIT Technology Review

They contend that the new state standards are medically unnecessary and that the law's real purpose is to reduce access to abortion.

The Washington Post

This year, voting is more than just the core responsibility of citizenship; it is an act of defiance against malicious political forces determined to reduce access to democracy.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "to reduce access", clearly specify what is having its access reduced and the reason for the reduction. This provides clarity and context to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "to reduce access" without specifying the target audience or area affected. Vague statements can lead to misinterpretations and confusion. For example, instead of saying "the policy reduces access", specify "the policy reduces access to healthcare for low-income families".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to reduce access" functions primarily as an infinitive phrase expressing purpose or intention. It typically appears after a verb, indicating the reason or goal behind an action. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

39%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "to reduce access" is a versatile and commonly used expression, primarily functioning as an infinitive phrase to indicate purpose. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and widely applicable across various domains. Analysis of numerous examples reveals its frequent use in news, scientific research, and academic discussions, where it denotes strategies aimed at limiting or restricting entry, availability, or interaction. While the phrase itself is generally neutral to formal, clarity is essential when using it; specifying what is having its access reduced and the reason why ensures effective communication. Alternative phrases, such as "to limit accessibility" or "to restrict entry", can offer slightly different nuances, allowing for precise expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to limit accessibility

This alternative directly replaces "reduce" with "limit" and "access" with "accessibility", maintaining a high degree of semantic similarity.

to restrict entry

This focuses on the act of entering, suggesting a control over who or what can gain access.

to curtail availability

This emphasizes limiting the quantity or ease of obtaining something.

to impede admittance

This suggests creating obstacles to prevent entry or acceptance.

to diminish approachability

This focuses on making something less approachable or accessible in a broader sense.

to lessen exposure

This suggests reducing the amount of contact or visibility related to something.

to minimize contact

Focuses on reducing the amount of physical or virtual interaction.

to suppress availability

Suggests actively preventing something from being available.

to control entry

Emphasizes a direct and deliberate management of access.

to downsize permission

This focuses on decreasing the scope or extent of allowed access.

FAQs

How can I use "to reduce access" in a sentence?

You can use "to reduce access" to describe actions taken to limit entry or availability, such as "The new security measures aim "to reduce access" to sensitive data".

What are some alternatives to "to reduce access"?

Alternatives include "to limit accessibility", "to restrict entry", or "to curtail availability", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more formal to say "to reduce access" or "to limit access"?

Both "to reduce access" and "to limit access" are generally acceptable in formal writing. The choice often depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.

Which is correct, "to reduce access" or "to increase access"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have opposite meanings. "To reduce access" means to limit or decrease accessibility, while "to increase access" means to expand or improve accessibility.