to be interfered with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to be interfered with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where something is affected or disrupted by external factors or actions. Example: "The project timeline should not be interfered with by unrelated tasks or distractions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

24 human-written examples

These are not to be interfered with".

Encyclopedia Britannica

"He doesn't need to be interfered with.

The New York Times - Sports

It is too important to be interfered with".

The New Yorker

"As the blog got more popular, updating it as frequently as a news and current affairs site needs to be, interfered with my real work.

The Guardian - Tech

He picked it up but then put his hand over the mouthpiece and took 30 seconds to finish his point, about how the democratic process sometimes needs to be interfered with for its own good.

The New York Times

We must protest, assert our freedoms and the right not to be interfered with, tracked, logged, photographed, patrolled, clamped and surreptitiously inspected by central and local government without good cause.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

"He's got to be interfering with play.

The Guardian - Sport

"I'm not going to be interfering with them," he added.

The New York Times - Sports

Ameobi was offside at the time but he could not be said to be interfering with play.

The Guardian - Sport

"In fact, they seem to be interfering with the solution, so that patients are discouraged from dealing with their problems.

The New York Times - Magazine

It would be able to dismiss local politicians, and to annul laws if they were deemed to be interfering with the peace settlement.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "to be interfered with" when you want to emphasize the passive nature of the subject receiving the interference. For example, "The experiment should not to be interfered with during the observation period."

Common error

While "to be interfered with" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak or unclear. Consider using the active voice when possible for a more direct and impactful statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be interfered with" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject is receiving an unwanted action or obstruction. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's grammatically correct and used to describe the state of being disrupted or influenced negatively.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to be interfered with" is a grammatically sound passive verb phrase used to express the idea of something being disrupted or negatively influenced. While Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, it's worth noting its relatively low frequency and the possibility of using active voice for more impactful writing. The phrase appears across various contexts, including news, encyclopedias, and scientific publications, showcasing its versatility in expressing concerns about unwanted obstruction. Consider the context and desired emphasis when choosing between active and passive constructions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to be disrupted

Focuses on the act of being interrupted and thrown into disorder, emphasizing the disturbance of a process or activity.

to be obstructed

Highlights the blocking or hindering of progress or movement, suggesting a more physical or direct impediment.

to be hindered

Emphasizes the slowing down or impediment of progress, implying a less forceful interruption than "disrupted".

to be hampered

Similar to "hindered" but suggests a more significant or restrictive impediment, affecting functionality or success.

to be impeded

Indicates a more formal or significant obstruction, often used in legal or official contexts.

to be meddled with

Suggests unwanted or inappropriate intervention, often implying a negative consequence from the interference.

to be tampered with

Implies secretive or unauthorized alteration, typically with malicious intent or harmful result.

to be influenced

Denotes a subtle form of interference where external factors affect decisions or outcomes without necessarily causing disruption.

to be affected

Describes a more general impact or change, potentially positive or negative, resulting from external forces.

to be compromised

Suggests a weakening or impairment of quality, integrity, or effectiveness due to external interference.

FAQs

How can I use "to be interfered with" in a sentence?

You can use "to be interfered with" to indicate that something should not be disrupted or have its process affected by external forces. For example, "The investigation should not "to be interfered with" by political interests."

What are some alternatives to "to be interfered with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "to be disrupted", "to be obstructed", or "to be hindered", which convey a similar meaning of unwanted interruption or influence.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing interference?

While both active and passive voice are grammatically correct, active voice (e.g., "Someone interfered with the experiment") is often more direct and impactful. Passive voice (e.g., "The experiment was interfered with") emphasizes the receiver of the action.

What is the difference between "to be interfered with" and "to be affected by"?

"To be interfered with" implies a negative disruption or obstruction, while "to be affected by" is a more general term indicating any kind of influence, positive or negative.